Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JORGE PEREZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JORGE PEREZ in LOT 71 153 OLD BAY DRIVE, PATASKALA, OH 43062 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344354808.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jorge Perez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jorge Perez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JORGE PEREZ
Site address
LOT 71 153 OLD BAY DRIVE
City
PATASKALA
State
OH
ZIP
43062
Mailing
3137 WESTERVILLE ROAD LOT 4, COLUMBUS, OH 43224
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2019
Abate by
Dec 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or about October 3, 2019 at the 153 Old Bay Drive, Pataskala, Ohio worksite, employees engaged in roofing activities on a two story single family home were not protected against falls from the second story roof. Employees were not protected by a personal fall arrest/fall protection system, safety net systems or a guardrail system. Due to this condition, employees were exposed an approximate 20 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

View Jorge Perez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344354808.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.