FORT WORTH, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ARTURO GARCIA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ARTURO GARCIA in 5528 MCLANAHAN, FORT WORTH, TX 76103 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344568415.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARTURO GARCIA
- Site address
- 5528 MCLANAHAN
- City
- FORT WORTH
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76103
- Mailing
- 516 POST OAK LANE, BURLESON, TX 76028
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 25, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,313 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns. At the jobsite, employees were not wearing hardhats while working below other employees that were framing a residential house, exposing employees to struck-by hazards from falling objects.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2313
1926.403 B01 I
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 25, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $3,470 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1)(i): Safety of equipment was not determined on the basis of suitability of the equipment for an identified purpose as evidenced by listing, labeling, or certification for that identified purpose. At the construction site, the four electrical receptacle box that was not approved by listing and labeling and manufacture design, with the design and method made and used by the employer, to energize hand held power equipment exposing employees to the hazard of electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $3470
1926.405 B02
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 25, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $3,470 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2): All pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers: At the construction site, the electrical receptacle box was not equipped with a cover plate, exposing employees to the hazard of electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $3470
1926.405 G02 III
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 25, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iii): Splices. Flexible cords shall be used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap. At the jobsite, employees used a yellow extension cord spliced to an orange extension cord and wrapped with black tape, supplying power to a Makita Skill saw, exposing employees to the hazard of electrical burns and shock.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 25, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,313 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used: At the jobsite, employees performing framing activities used a yellow extension cord that was severely cut and frayed, supplying power to a circular saw, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2313
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 25, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system. At the jobsite, employees engaged in framing activities at a height of over 6 feet were not protected by a fall arrest system. Employees were exposed to an unprotected fall of over 9 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $4048
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 25, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $1,735 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: At the jobsite, employees performing framing activities were not provided fall protection. The employer did not provide a training program with hazard recognition and avoidance training where part of the job is to be exposed to fall hazards at a heights over 6 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $1735
More inspections at Arturo Garcia
View Arturo Garcia's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344568415.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.