Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DANIEL GARCIA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DANIEL GARCIA in 6125 BARCLAY CT, CANAL WINCHESTER, OH 43110 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344748397.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Daniel Garcia — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Daniel Garcia is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DANIEL GARCIA
Site address
6125 BARCLAY CT
City
CANAL WINCHESTER
State
OH
ZIP
43110
Mailing
265 COLUMBIAN AVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43223
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2020
Abate by
Jun 9, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a. On or about May 12, 2020, the employer failed to maintain a safety and health program to address hazards such as fall protection during framing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2020
Abate by
Jun 9, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.  a. On or about May 12, 2020, the employer failed to instruct each employee in the avoidance of unsafe conditions while performing framing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2020
Abate by
Jun 9, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a. On or about May 12, 2020, the employer operated a pneumatic nail gun without the use of eye and face protection, thereby exposed himself to a eye and face hazard from flying particles, and demonstrating the lack of safety and safety knowledge to the employees.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2020
Abate by
Jun 9, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or about May 12, 2020, the employer was conducting framing activities from elevated heights without fall protection, thereby exposing himself to an approximately 11 foot fall hazard. The employer was exposed in front of all his employees.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2020
Abate by
Jun 9, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder shall not be used as a step.  a. On or about May 12, 2020, the employer used the top plate as a step on a 6 foot fiberglass stepladder, thereby exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4048

View Daniel Garcia's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344748397.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.