Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GOLD CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GOLD CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 975 CORNWALL AVENUE, CHESHIRE, CT 06408 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345015150.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gold Construction, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gold Construction, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
975 CORNWALL AVENUE
City
CHESHIRE
State
CT
ZIP
06408
Mailing
27 WESTLAND ROAD, BURLINGTON, CT 06013
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2020
Abate by
Jan 15, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,892 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).  Worksite: The employer who was operating the All-Terrain forklift powered industrial truck (PIT) was not trained in the safe operation of the PIT.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2892

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,892 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person.  Worksite: The "job-made" wooden platform that was used as an elevated work platform was not designed by a qualified person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2892

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(c)(2)(v): The employer used forklifts to support scaffold platforms without ensuring that the entire platform was attached to the fork and that the forklift was not moved horizontally while the platform was occupied.  Worksite: The "job-made" wooden platform that was used as an elevated work platform was not positively attached to the forks of the All-Terrain powered industrial truck (PIT) while the work platform was being elevated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,892 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b).  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were framing the residence under construction were protected from fall hazards above 6 feet by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2892

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2020
Abate by
Jan 15, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,892 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were exposed to fall hazards at a height above 6 feet while framing the residence under construction were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2892

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2020
Abate by
Jan 15, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was required to work from an elevated work platform was trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Gold Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345015150.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.