BOSTON, MA —
OSHA Inspection: JDC DEMOLITION COMPANY, INC.
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of JDC DEMOLITION COMPANY, INC. in GOVERNMENT CENTER GARAGE, BOSTON, MA 02114 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 345875868.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch JDC Demolition Company, INC. — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JDC Demolition Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JDC DEMOLITION COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- GOVERNMENT CENTER GARAGE
- City
- BOSTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02114
- Mailing
- 338 HOWARD STREET, BROCKTON, MA 02302
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238910
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $14,502 · Current $14,502
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. Location: Jobsite A worker was fatally injured and other workers were exposed to fall, struck-by, crushing, and other hazards associated with building collapse where the employer did not maintain or enforce the accident prevention programs that they had developed.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $14502
- — C (S) $14502
- — Z (S) $14502
1926.850 I
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $14,502 · Current $14,502
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.850(i): Floor openings, not used as material drops, were not covered with a material substantial enough to support the weight of the load to be imposed. Location: Jobsite Workers were exposed to trip hazards where 10 inch holes had been cored and were left un-covered, and holes that had been covered were not secured.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $14502
- — C (S) $14502
- — Z (S) $14502
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $145,027 · Current $145,027
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury. Location: Jobsite Worker#1 was exposed to hazards such as building collapse, struck-by, trip/fall and crushing hazards where employees had not been trained to recognize and avoid overloading of floors during demolition.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $145027
- — C (W) $145027
- — Z (W) $145027
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $145,027 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury. Location: Jobsite Worker #2 was exposed to hazards such as building collapse, struck-by, trip/fall and crushing hazards where employees had not been trained to recognize and avoid overloading of floors during demolition.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (W) $145027
- — Z (W) $145027
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $145,027 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury. Location: Jobsite Worker #3 was exposed to hazards such as building collapse, struck-by, trip/fall, and crushing hazards where employees had not been trained to recognize and avoid overloading of floors during demolition.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (W) $145027
- — Z (W) $145027
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $145,027 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury. Location: Jobsite Worker #4 was exposed to hazards such as building collapse, struck-by, trip/fall, and crushing hazards where employees had not been trained to recognize and avoid overloading of floors during demolition.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (W) $145027
- — Z (W) $145027
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $145,027 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury. Location: Jobsite Worker #5 was exposed to hazards such as building collapse, struck-by, trip/fall, and crushing hazards where employees had not been trained to recognize and avoid overloading of floors during demolition.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (W) $145027
- — Z (W) $145027
1926.856 A
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $145,027 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.856(a): Floors or working surfaces were not of sufficient strength to support the imposed load of mechanical equipment. Location: 7th Floor Employees were exposed to building collapse, struck-by, trip/fall, and crushing hazards where precast concrete floors that had been saw-cut and partially demolished were not of sufficient strength to support the imposed load of mechanical equipment.
Recent events (3)
- — F (W) $0
- — C (W) $145027
- — Z (W) $145027
1926.856 A
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $145,027 · Current $103,897 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.856(a): Floors or working surfaces were not of sufficient strength to support the imposed load of mechanical equipment. Location: 8th Floor Employees were exposed to building collapse, struck-by, trip/fall, and crushing hazards where precast concrete floors that had been saw-cut and partially demolished were not of sufficient strength to support the imposed load of mechanical equipment.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $103897
- — C (W) $145027
- — Z (W) $145027
1926.856 A
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $145,027 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.856(a): Floors or working surfaces were not of sufficient strength to support the imposed load of mechanical equipment. Location: 9th Floor Employees were exposed to building collapse, struck-by, trip/fall, and crushing hazards where precast concrete floors that had been saw-cut and partially demolished were not of sufficient strength to support the imposed load of mechanical equipment.
Recent events (3)
- — F (W) $0
- — C (W) $145027
- — Z (W) $145027
1904.29 B04
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,072 · Current $2,072
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(4):29 CFR 1904.29(b)(4): A form with equivalent information to OSHA's 301, Injury and Illness Incident Report, was not used by the employer to document each recordable injury and illness entered on the OSHA 300 Log. The employer utilized a form in lieu of the OSHA 301 which did not contain the requisite information in that; A) The form did not have the employee's date of hire B) The form did not identify the case number from the company's 300 log C) The form did not contain the date of the employee's death
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $2072
- — C (O) $2072
- — Z (O) $2072
More inspections at JDC Demolition Company, INC.
Jan 14, 2025
HUDSON, MA
Jul 12, 2023
BOSTON, MA
Oct 19, 2022
BOSTON, MA
Dec 29, 2020
BOSTON, MA
Feb 14, 2020
BOSTON, MA
View JDC Demolition Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238910)
Jul 16, 2026
R M Pacella INC · ATTLEBORO, MA
Jul 16, 2026
WA317992094 - TOP Shelf Cranes INC · BOTHELL, WA
Jul 16, 2026
69335 - Flynn Brothers Contracting INC · LOUISVILLE, KY
Jul 15, 2026
Astech Corporation · CHARLESTON, WV
Jul 14, 2026
American Wrecking INC · LOS ANGELES, CA
More inspections in MA
Jul 17, 2026
M&M Construction Services Corp · WESTFORD, MA
Jul 16, 2026
R M Pacella INC · ATTLEBORO, MA
Jul 16, 2026
A.M.B. Iron LLC · LYNN, MA
Jul 16, 2026
A&S Carpentry, INC. · NEWTON, MA
Jul 16, 2026
Bellingham Department of Public Works · BELLINGHAM, MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345875868.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.