Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: REDDY ICE LLC

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of REDDY ICE LLC in 289 BULLDOG RD., FREEPORT, FL 32439 (NAICS 312113). OSHA activity number 345884456.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Reddy ICE LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Reddy ICE LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
REDDY ICE LLC
Site address
289 BULLDOG RD.
City
FREEPORT
State
FL
ZIP
32439
Mailing
289 BULLDOG RD., FREEPORT, FL 32439
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
312113
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2022
Abate by
Jul 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $7,044 · Current $3,550 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR  1910.95(c)(1):The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  a) Robotic ice stacker; On or about April 6, 2022 and at times prior to the employer exposed noise at levels 58.9% dose (equivalent to a 8  hour TWA of 86.1 dBA) which is approximately 1.17 times the action level of 50% dose (equivalent to a 12 hour TWA of 82.1).  Results are based on 642 minutes sampling period of a 720 minute shift.  Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 78 minute period not sampled.  The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3550
  • — Z (S) $7044

1910.95 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2022
Abate by
Jul 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR  1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:  a) Robotic ice stacker; On or about April 6, 2022 and at times prior to the employer exposed noise at levels 58.9% dose (equivalent to a 8  hour TWA of 86.1 dBA) which is approximately 1.17 times the action level of 50% dose (equivalent to a 12 hour TWA of 82.1).  Results are based on 642 minutes sampling period of a 720 minute shift.  Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 78 minute period not sampled.  The employer did not administer a monitoring program to determine employee exposure to noise.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2022
Abate by
Jul 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR  1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:   a) Robotic ice stacker; On or about April 6, 2022 and at times prior to the employer exposed noise at levels 58.9% dose (equivalent to a 8  hour TWA of 86.1 dBA) which is approximately 1.17 times the action level of 50% dose (equivalent to a 12 hour TWA of 82.1).  Results are based on 642 minutes sampling period of a 720 minute shift.  Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 78 minute period not sampled.  The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2022
Abate by
Jul 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $7,044 · Current $3,550 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(i):Procedures were not developed for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  (a) Robotic ice stacker; On or about April 4, 2022 and at times prior to the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that employees were allowed to enter the robotic cell to clear jams without first developing procedures to control hazardous stored energy or inadvertent start up of the machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3550
  • — Z (S) $7044

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2022
Abate by
Jul 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:    (a) Robotic ice stacker; On or about April 4, 2022 and at times prior to the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that employees were allowed to enter the robotic cell to clear jams without first being trained on the control of hazardous energies.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 F03 II D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2022
Abate by
Jul 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment:   (a) Robotic ice stacker; On or about April 4, 2022 and at times prior to the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that employees were allowed to enter the robotic cell to clear jams without each employee first applying a lockout device to prevent inadvertent start-up.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Reddy ICE LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345884456.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.