Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUIS PEREZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS PEREZ in 4493 SCIOTO CHASE BLVD, POWELL, OH 43065 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345940555.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Luis Perez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luis Perez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LUIS PEREZ
Site address
4493 SCIOTO CHASE BLVD
City
POWELL
State
OH
ZIP
43065
Mailing
119 N CHASE AVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43204
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2022
Abate by
May 25, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1):It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  On or about May 4, 2022, the employer did not maintain an effective a safety and health program to ensure all fall hazards were identified and corrected while employees performed framing work.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2022
Abate by
May 25, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  On or about May 4, 2022, employees were performing framing work on a two story, single family home and were walking on the tops of walls and near edges of floors that were over 6 feet high with no fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3108

View Luis Perez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345940555.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.