Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ADVANCED COIL INDUSTRY

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ADVANCED COIL INDUSTRY in 175 PLUMPTON AVENUE, WASHINGTON, PA 15301 (NAICS 333519). OSHA activity number 346090871.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Advanced Coil Industry — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Advanced Coil Industry is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
175 PLUMPTON AVENUE
City
WASHINGTON
State
PA
ZIP
15301
Mailing
175 PLUMPTON AVENUE, WASHINGTON, PA 15301
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333519
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2022
Abate by
Dec 5, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1):   A continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) was not instituted when employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 dBA:  a)  In the Facility, on or about July 20, 2022 - The employer did not institute a continuing effective hearing conservation program when employee noise exposures exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA.  An employee designated as a laminator operator was exposed to noise at a level of 101.7% of the allowable limit during a 377 minute sampling period on July 20, 2022.   This exposure is equivalent to a sound level of 90.1 dBA for the dose and time of employee exposure and is 2.03 times in excess of the 85 dBA action level (50%) at which the hearing conservation program is required.  b)  In the Facility, on or about July 20, 2022 -  An employee designated as a laminator operator was exposed to noise at a level of 102.4% of the allowable limit during a 373 minute sampling period on July 20, 2022.   This exposure is equivalent to a sound level of 90.2 dBA for the dose and time of employee exposure and is 2.05 times in excess of the 85 dBA action level (50%) at which the hearing conservation program is required.  c)  In the Facility, on or about July 20, 2022 -  An employee designated as a crane operator was exposed to noise at a level of 118.2% of the allowable limit during a 378 minute sampling period on July 20, 2022.   This exposure is equivalent to a sound level of 91.2 dBA for the dose and time of employee exposure and is 2.36 times in excess of the 85 dBA action level (50%) at which the hearing conservation program is required.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3108

1910.95 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR  1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:   a)  In the Facility, on or about July 20, 2022 - The employer did not develop and implement a noise monitoring program when information indicated that employee's noise exposures equaled or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels.  Employees were exposed to noise at levels above 85 decibels.  See descriptions of employee noise exposure in Citation 1, Item 1a, Instances a-c.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2022
Abate by
Dec 5, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR  1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:   a)  In the Facility, on or about July 20, 2022 - The employer did not provide an audiometric test to employees whose noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels.   See descriptions of employee noise exposure in Citation 1, Item 1a, Instances a-c.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2022
Abate by
Dec 5, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR  1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k):    a)  In the Facility, on or about July 20, 2022 - The employer did not provide noise related training to employees whose noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels.   See descriptions of employee noise exposure in Citation 1, Item 1a, Instances a-c.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 L01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2022
Abate by
Dec 5, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR  1910.95(l)(1): The employer did not post of copy of 29 CFR 1910.95 in the workplace:    a)  In the Facility, on or about July 20, 2022 - The employer did not post a copy of 29 CFR 1910.95, the Occupational Noise Standard in the workplace.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2022
Abate by
Dec 5, 2022
Penalty
Initial $1,865 · Current $1,865
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a)  In the Facility, on or about July 20, 2022 - The employer did not develop, implement and/or maintain a written hazard communication program at the facility.  Employees of the facility work with hazardous materials including but not limited to Gardoclean 338 U and Permatreat 1500, both of which are corrosive materials.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1865

1910.1200 F06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2022
Abate by
Oct 27, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and word, pictures and/or symbols which provide the general information regarding the hazards of the chemical:   a)  In the Facility, on or about July 29, 2022 - The employer did not ensure that a 1500 gallon holding tank of Gardoclean 338 U, a corrosive material,  was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and word, pictures and/or symbols which provide general information regarding the hazards of the chemical.  b)  In the Facility, on or about July 29, 2022 - The employer did not ensure that a 6 gallon holding tank of Permatreat 1500, a corrosive material,  was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and word, pictures and/or symbols which provide general information regarding the hazards of the chemical.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2022
Abate by
Dec 5, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   a)  In the Facility, on or about July 20, 2022 - The employer did not provide effective information and training to employees on the hazardous chemicals in their work areas.  Employees of the facility work with hazardous materials including but not limited to Gardoclean 338 U and Permatreat 1500, both of which are corrosive materials.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Advanced Coil Industry's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346090871.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.