Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GREAT LAKES POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES LLC

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of GREAT LAKES POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES LLC in 100 S. FABPRO WAY, KINGMAN, KS 67068 (NAICS 325220). OSHA activity number 346128697.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Great Lakes Polymer Technologies LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Great Lakes Polymer Technologies LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
100 S. FABPRO WAY
City
KINGMAN
State
KS
ZIP
67068
Mailing
701 E. A AVENUE, KINGMAN, KS 67068
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325220
Employees
150
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2023
Abate by
Jun 1, 2026
Penalty
Initial $11,162 · Current $11,162
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that all places of employment, passageways, storerooms, service rooms, and walking-working surfaces are kept in a clean, orderly, and sanitary condition:  At the employer's manufacturing facility, employee(s) were exposed to slip, trip, and fall hazards when places of employment, passageways, storerooms, and walking-working surfaces were not kept in a clean and orderly condition in the following circumstances:  1) At the CAB Area in and around the Compression Auto Bagger (CAB) machine near Tipper #1, large amounts of plastic particulates were laying on the floor and in the walkways.  2) In the CAB Area on the upper-level walkway, the walkways and floors contained plastic pieces, and other items, including, but not limited to pieces of metal and a hose.  3) At the CAB Area, a 55-gallon drum of industrial hydraulic fluid was found leaking from the top through the bunghole onto the floor.  4) In the Recycling Area, the floor contained plastic particulates.  5) In the Oil Storage Area, an oil absorbent was on the floor and had not been swept up from the floor.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $11162
  • — C (S) $11162
  • — Z (S) $11162

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2023
Abate by
Jun 1, 2026
Penalty
Initial $15,625 · Current $15,625
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:   In the CAB area, employee(s) engaged in servicing and maintenance activities on the Compression Auto Bagger (CAB) machine, were exposed to amputation, caught in, and lacerations hazards in that the employer did not perform periodic inspections of the existing procedures for machines with dual sources of energy to ensure the procedures were adequate.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $15625
  • — C (S) $15625
  • — Z (S) $15625

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2023
Abate by
Jun 1, 2026
Penalty
Initial $15,625 · Current $15,625
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation:  In the CAB Area, employee(s) engaged in servicing and/or maintenance activities on the Compression Auto Bagger machine were exposed to amputation, caught in, and laceration hazards in that employee(s) were not provided with authorized employee training as it relates to hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, nor the methods and means for energy isolation before engaging in those work operations.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $15625
  • — C (S) $15625
  • — Z (S) $15625

1910.147 C07 I B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2023
Abate by
Jun 1, 2026
Penalty
Initial $15,625 · Current $15,625
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure:  In the CAB Area and the Extrusion Area, employee(s) working in the Compression Auto Bagger (CAB) area and at the #2 Godet extrusion machine at Line 11 were exposed to amputation, caught in, and laceration hazards in that affected employee(s) were not provided with any training as it relates to the purpose and use of the energy control procedures.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $15625
  • — C (S) $15625
  • — Z (S) $15625

1910.147 D04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2023
Abate by
Jun 1, 2026
Penalty
Initial $15,625 · Current $15,625
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4): A lockout device was not attached to all power sources:   In the CAB Area, on the Compression Auto Bagger (CAB) machine, employee(s) engaged in servicing and/or maintenance activities were exposed to amputation, struck by, caught in, and lacerations hazards in that a lock was not placed on the machine, prior to a clog on the machine being cleared/cleaned.    This was most recently observed when employees were clearing a jam on August 4, 2022.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $15625
  • — C (S) $15625
  • — Z (S) $15625

1910.219 C02 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2023
Abate by
Jun 1, 2026
Penalty
Initial $15,625 · Current $15,625
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting:   In the CAB Area, employee(s) engaged in plastic manufacturing and production activities at the Compression Auto Bagger (CAB) machine were exposed to amputation and caught-in hazards in that the horizontal rotating shafts for the agitation bar on the outside of Tipper #1 and Tipper #2 near the drive motors were not guarded.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $15625
  • — C (S) $15625
  • — Z (S) $15625

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2023
Abate by
Jun 1, 2026
Penalty
Initial $15,625 · Current $15,625
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft:  In the CAB Area, employee(s) engaged in plastic manufacturing production activities on the Compression Auto Bagger (CAB) machine were exposed to amputation and caught in hazards in that a one-inch diameter drive shaft end, projected one inch without any type of machine guarding on Tipper #1 and Tipper #2.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $15625
  • — C (S) $15625
  • — Z (S) $15625

1910.147 C04 I

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2023
Abate by
Jun 1, 2026
Penalty
Initial $156,259 · Current $156,259
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented, and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  In the CAB Area, employee(s) engaged in servicing and maintenance activities on the Compression Auto Bagger (CAB) machine at Tippers #1-3 were exposed to electrical, struck-by, amputation, and caught-between hazards in that procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy were not utilized when employees unjammed the CAB machine.  On August 4, 2022, an employee was fatally injured while working on the CAB machine and attempting to unjam a clog in the chute connected to Tipper #1 without utilizing procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (W) $156259
  • — C (W) $156259
  • — Z (W) $156259

1910.212 A01

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2023
Abate by
Jun 1, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:   In the CAB Area, the rotating agitator on the Compression Auto Bagger (CAB) machine at Tipper #1 was guarded by a metal grate.  The metal guard was connected to an interlock switch designed to shut the machine off when the grate was opened.  On August 4, 2022, an employee was fatally injured when he opened the metal grate and the machine failed to shut off.  The employee became entangled in the rotating agitator and died.  The machine failed to shut off because the interlock was bypassed with duct tape so that when the guard was opened the agitator continued to rotate.  As a result of the bypassed interlock, employees, including the decedent, were exposed to struck-by, amputation, and caught-between hazards from the unguarded rotating agitator on Tipper #1 when the grate was opened.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (W) $0
  • — C (W) $0
  • — Z (W) $0

1910.212 A01

Repeat Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2023
Abate by
Jun 1, 2026
Penalty
Initial $31,250 · Current $31,250
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  In the Extrusion Area, employee(s) engaged in production activities at the #2 Godet of the Line 11 extrusion machine were exposed to amputation and caught in hazards in that the protruding rollers for the machine were not guarded.  Great Lakes Polymer Technologies LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 1910.212(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1368959, citation number 1, item number 3, and was affirmed as a final order on 04-08-2019, with respect to a workplace located at 100 Fabpro Way Kingman, KS 67068.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $31250
  • — C (R) $31250
  • — Z (R) $31250

View Great Lakes Polymer Technologies LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346128697.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.