Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PINE HILL MANUFACTURING, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PINE HILL MANUFACTURING, LLC in 125 KING COURT, NEW HOLLAND, PA 17557 (NAICS 336212). OSHA activity number 346405129.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Pine Hill Manufacturing, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pine Hill Manufacturing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
125 KING COURT
City
NEW HOLLAND
State
PA
ZIP
17557
Mailing
5140 MARTIN DR, GAP, PA 17527
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336212
Employees
51
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2023
Abate by
Sep 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $8,036 · Current $4,250 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  a) 125 King Court, New Holland, PA - Facility Wide - On or about December 22, 2022, employees were conducting truck trailer fabrication/assembly operations with the use of various metal fabrication machinery (saws, presses, sheers, plasma cutters) without an establish hazardous energy control program and/or employee training and periodic inspections.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4250
  • — Z (S) $8036

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 51 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2023
Abate by
Sep 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,026 · Current $4,250 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment:  a) 125 King Court, New Holland, PA - Facility Wide - On or about December 22, 2022, the employees were utilizing personal protective equipment including, but not limited too safety glasses, gloves, etc. Employees did not have training on the personal protective equipment to prevent employee exposure to eye injuries and hand injuries during tasks associated with metal fabrication processes.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4250
  • — Z (S) $6026

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 51 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2023
Abate by
Sep 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:   a) 125 King Court, New Holland, PA - Facility Wide - On or about December 22, 2022, the employees were utilizing personal protective equipment including, but not limited too safety glasses, gloves, etc. The employer did not have a written certification for the personal protective equipment utilized by employees to prevent exposure to eye injuries and hand injuries during tasks associated with metal fabrication processes.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 51 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2023
Abate by
Sep 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.132(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not communicate personal protection equipment selection decision(s) to each affected employee:  a) 125 King Court, New Holland, PA - Facility Wide - On or about December 22, 2022, the employees were utilizing personal protective equipment including, but not limited too safety glasses, gloves, etc. Employees did not receive training or communication associated with the selection of personal protective equipment required for metal fabrication processes.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1026 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2023
Abate by
Sep 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $1,128 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR  1910.1026(d)(1):The employer did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI).  a) 125 King Court, New Holland, PA - Facility Wide - On or about December 22, 2022,  employees conducting stainless steel welding operations were not assessed for hexavalent chromium exposure.   Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $1128

View Pine Hill Manufacturing, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346405129.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.