Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PEDRO PALMER CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PEDRO PALMER CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 370 GEORGE PATTERSON BLVD., BRISTOL, PA 19007 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 346929078.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Pedro Palmer Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pedro Palmer Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
370 GEORGE PATTERSON BLVD.
City
BRISTOL
State
PA
ZIP
19007
Mailing
2460 N 5TH STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19133
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238910
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2023
Abate by
Sep 29, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,875 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.  a)	370 George Patterson Blvd. Bristol, PA:  On or about August 23, 2023, employee(s) used a pneumatic jackhammer without a continuous water delivery system located at the point of impact as required by Table 1. Employee(s) were performing demolition work on materials containing silica on the outside facade of the building without the use of respiratory protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $6875

1926.1153 D02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2023
Abate by
Sep 29, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section.  a)	370 George Patterson Blvd. Bristol, PA:  On or about August 23, 2023, the employer did not conduct an exposure assessment to determine the levels of respirable crystalline silica employees were expected to be exposed to while performing demolition activities on materials containing crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 I01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2023
Abate by
Oct 6, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,875 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1153(i)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee is trained in accordance with the provisions of the Hazard Commumication Standard and paragraph (i)(2) of this section.  a)	370 George Patterson Blvd. Bristol, PA:  On or about August 23, 2023, the employer did not train employees on the health hazards associated with exposure to respirable crystalline silica, tasks that could result in exposure to silica, and measures to be used to protect from potential exposures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $6875

1926.501 B01

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2023
Abate by
Sep 29, 2023
Penalty
Initial $13,750 · Current $10,500 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  a) 370 George Patterson Blvd. Bristol, PA - On or about August 23, 2023, two employees were working on a concrete canopy approximately 20 feet above the ground without the use of fall protection.  Pedro Palmer Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of an equivalent Occupational Safety and Health Standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1617528, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 5/22/2023 with respect to a workplace located at 3344 N 22nd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $10500
  • — Z (R) $13750

1926.150 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2023
Abate by
Sep 29, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.150(a)(2): Access to all available firefighting equipment was not maintained at all times.  a) 370 George Patterson Blvd. Bristol, PA - On or about August 23, 2023, employees working with flammable liquids did not have access to firefighting equipment, such as a portable fire extinguisher.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Pedro Palmer Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346929078.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.