BRISTOL, CT —
OSHA Inspection: CLASSIC COIL COMPANY, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CLASSIC COIL COMPANY, INC. in 205 CENTURY DRIVE, BRISTOL, CT 06010 (NAICS 334416). OSHA activity number 347041287.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CLASSIC COIL COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 205 CENTURY DRIVE
- City
- BRISTOL
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06010
- Mailing
- 205 CENTURY DRIVE, BRISTOL, CT 06010
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 334416
- Employees
- 68
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,387 · Current $1,694 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Fine Wire: On, or about, October 18, 2023, the company had not developed and implemented a written respirator program. An employee was required to don a Honeywell elastomeric half-mask respirator when cleaning around the caustic pot.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1693.5
- — Z (S) $3387
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Fine Wire: On, or about, October 18, 2023, the company had not provided a medical evaluation to an employee who was required to don a Honeywell elastomeric half-mask respirator when cleaning around the caustic pot.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: Fine Wire: On, or about, October 18, 2023, the company had not provided a fit test to an employee who was required to don a Honeywell elastomeric half-mask respirator when cleaning around the caustic pot.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,516 · Current $2,258 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees: Company: On, or about, the first week of October, 2023, an employee completed a repair on the Tenney curing oven without the electrical disconnect in the "off" position and a lockout out device and tag affixed to the lockout point on the electrical disconnect.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2258
- — Z (S) $4516
1910.147 F03 II D
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment: Company: On, or about, the first week of October, 2023, each employee involved with the repair of the Tenney curing oven did not affix a lockout device and tag to the lockout point on the electrical disconnect. Abatement Note: The existing lockout program did not address group lockout procedures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L04 II B
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,516 · Current $2,258 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(ii)(B): Refresher training and evaluation was not provided to the operator when the operator was involved in an accident or near-miss accident: Company: On, or about, October 18, 2023, refresher training and evaluation had not been provided to the operator of the Nissan forklift following incidents involving property damage.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2258
- — Z (S) $4516
More inspections at Classic Coil Company, INC.
View Classic Coil Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 334416)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347041287.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.