Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CASCO BAY STEEL STRUCTURES, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CASCO BAY STEEL STRUCTURES, INC. in 1 WALLACE AVENUE, SOUTH PORTLAND, ME 04106 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 347123911.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Casco BAY Steel Structures, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Casco BAY Steel Structures, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1 WALLACE AVENUE
City
SOUTH PORTLAND
State
ME
ZIP
04106
Mailing
1 WALLACE AVENUE, SOUTH PORTLAND, ME 04106
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
128
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 B08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $7,052 · Current $7,052
29 CFR  1910.23(b)(8): The employer did not ensure that ladders are used only for the purposes for which they were designed:  Establishment - An employee utilized a Louisville Cross X Step ladder to access the top of a bridge girder, and the self-supporting ladder was not designed for this purpose.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7052
  • — Z (S) $7052

1910.23 C11

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.23(c)(11) The employer did not ensure that portable ladders used to gain access to an upper landing surface had side rails that extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface:  Establishment - An employee used a Louisville Cross X Step ladder to gain access to a bridge girder, and the side rails of the ladder extended only 23 inches above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.23 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.23(b)(10): The employer did not ensure that ladder(s) with structural or other defects was immediately tagged "Dangerous: Do Not Use" or with similar language in accordance with � 1910.145 and removed from service until repaired in accordance with � 1910.22(d), or replaced.  Establishment - An employee was utilizing a Louisville Cross X Step ladder with a damaged spreader bar to access the top of a bridge girder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,816 · Current $8,816
29 CFR  1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by one or more of the systems described in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i):  Establishment - The employer did not ensure that employees who were working on the bridge girders at heights of over 8 feet were equipped with fall protection systems (guardrails, netting, or arrest system).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8816
  • — Z (S) $8816

1910.30 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,816 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.30(a)(1): The employer did not provide training for employee(s) exposed to a fall hazards, and the requirements of this Subpart:  Establishment - Employer did not adequately train employees, on the use and need for personal fall arrest equipment, before allowing them to work on a bridge girder 8 feet above the lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $8816

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,816 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s)(a):  Powered industrial trucks in need of repair were not taken out of service, in the following instances:  a) Hyster 210XL Forklift - The front and rear windshields were broken. b) Yale 60VX Forklift - The seatbelt was damaged and had been bypassed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $8816

1910.179 N04 I

Serious Gravity 1 9 instances 50 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $5,288 · Current $526 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(n)(4)(i): The upper limit switch of each hoist was not tried out under no load, at the beginning of each operator's shift:  Establishment - The employer allowed the use of 9 bridge cranes without ensuring that the upper limit switches were checked before each shift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $526
  • — Z (S) $5288

View Casco BAY Steel Structures, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347123911.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.