Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NANA'S CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of NANA'S CONSTRUCTION, INC. in M755+646, ILI ILI, WESTERN DISTRICT, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 347243222.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nana'S Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nana'S Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
M755+646, ILI ILI, WESTERN DISTRICT
City
PAGO PAGO
State
AS
ZIP
96799
Mailing
P.O. BOX 1027, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
40
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2024
Abate by
Jul 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $5,323 · Current $5,323
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103(a)):  A written respiratory program was not developed for employees required to wear N95 respirators while sweeping silica dust. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5323

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2024
Abate by
Jul 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   At least one employee required to use an N95 disposable particulate filtering facepiece respirator was not medically cleared prior to use. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2024
Abate by
Jul 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a)):    At least one employee required to use an N95 disposable particulate filtering facepiece respirator without being fit tested for a proper fit and seal prior to use. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2024
Abate by
Jul 5, 2024
Penalty
Initial $5,323 · Current $5,323
29 CFR  1926.1153(f)(1):The employer allowed dry sweeping or dry brushing where such activity could contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica and wet sweeping, HEPA-filtered vacuuming or other methods were feasible:  Main club house: Employees were tasked to sweep the floors that contained crystalline dust and debris as part of their housekeeping duties. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5323

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2024
Abate by
Jul 5, 2024
Penalty
Initial $996 · Current $996
29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(8):  The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s)  Copies of the safety data sheets were not maintained onsite for hazardous chemicals to include Easy Sand 90 Sheetrock Joint Compound, ZINSSER Bulls Eye 1-2-3 water base, interior and exterior primer, Contractor Pro Contratista Pro Exterior Semi-gloss paint, and C+K Contractor Pro Contratista Pro Interior Semi-gloss paint that were in use at the jobsite. Employees were exposed to chemical hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $996

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2024
Abate by
Jul 5, 2024
Penalty
Initial $996 · Current $996
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)(a):  A written HAZCOM program was not developed for employees required to work with hazardous chemicals such as Easy Sand 90 Sheetrock Joint Compound, ZINSSER Bulls Eye 1-2-3 water base, interior and exterior primer, Contractor Pro Contratista Pro Exterior Semi-gloss paint, and C+K Contractor Pro Contratista Pro Interior Semi-gloss paint that were in use at the jobsite. Employees were exposed to chemical hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $996

View Nana'S Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347243222.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.