Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LARSEN MANUFACTURING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LARSEN MANUFACTURING in 12150 ROJAS DR. SUITE E, EL PASO, TX 79936 (NAICS 332119). OSHA activity number 347260788.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Larsen Manufacturing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Larsen Manufacturing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
12150 ROJAS DR. SUITE E
City
EL PASO
State
TX
ZIP
79936
Mailing
12150 ROJAS DR. SUITE E, EL PASO, TX 79936
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332119
Employees
146
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 11 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2024
Abate by
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $9,521 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable injury that could be prevented by such equipment.   Production Floor:  On or about February 06, 2024, employees were exposed to impact (eye) hazards in the following instances.  1) Press #3 Area, an employee was observed wearing prescription eyewear side shields, but the frames and lens were not American National Standards Institute (ANSI-Z87.1) rated safety eyewear.  2) On press #5, an employee was observed wearing prescription eyewear side shields, but the frames and lens were not American National Standards Institute (ANSI-Z87.1) rated safety eyewear.  3) Press #7 Area, an employee was observed wearing prescription eyewear side shields, but the frames and lens were not American National Standards Institute (ANSI-Z87.1) rated safety eyewear.   4) Press #10 Area, an employee was observed wearing prescription eyewear side shields, but the frames and lens were not American National Standards Institute (ANSI-Z87.1) rated safety eyewear.   5) Press #12 Area, an employee was observed wearing prescription eyewear side shields, but the frames and lens were not American National Standards Institute (ANSI-Z87.1) rated safety eyewear.   6) Press #18 Area, an employee was observed wearing prescription eyewear side shields, but the frames and lens were not American National Standards Institute (ANSI-Z87.1) rated safety eyewear.   7) Quality Control Room, an employee was observed wearing prescription eyewear side shields, but the frames and lens were not American National Standards Institute (ANSI-Z87.1) rated safety eyewear.   8) Tool Room: Four employees were observed wearing prescription eyewear side shields, but the frames and lens were not American National Standards Institute (ANSI-Z87.1) rated safety eyewear.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6000
  • — Z (S) $9521

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 7 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2024
Abate by
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $9,521 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposed an employee to injury, was not guarded:   On or about February 06, 2024, in the Tool Room; point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded in the following instances.  1) Two Bridgeport Milling Machines were missing guards at the point of operation.  2) The Clausing Milling Machine was missing a guard at the point of operation.  3) The Profit Master Lathe Machine (Model 15X40/Serial #2713, 220V) was missing a guard at the point of operation.  4)  The 18"Grob Vertical Band Saw (Model 4V-18, Serial #2826) was missing a guard at the point of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6000
  • — Z (S) $9521

1910.212 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2024
Abate by
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(2): Guard(s) on machine(s) were not affixed to the machine or secured elsewhere when attachment to the machine was not possible.   On or about February 06, 2024, the Willis-Microcut Milling Machine (Model 1050I, Serial #980821S, 220/440V 3 HP), had a flexible magnetic plexi-shield guard that was not affixed or secured to the machine. This condition exposed employees to impact/struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2024
Abate by
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,760 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:  Tool Room:  On or about February 06, 2024, the 8" Dayton Bench Grinder (Model 4Z909C, 3/4 HP-3450-RPMs), the distance between the adjustable guard exceeded one-fourth inch. The measured distance between the adjustable tongue guard and wheel was 3/4 of an inch exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4760

1910.217 C03 VIII D

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2024
Abate by
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $11,106 · Current $8,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(3)(viii)(d): Two hand trip devices of mechanical power press(es) were not fixed in position so that only a supervisor or safety engineer was capable of relocating the controls:  Production Floor: On or about June 6, 2023, employees were exposed to caught-between/struck-by hazards in that the two hand trip devices of mechanical power press(es) listed below were not fixed in position so that only a supervisor or safety engineer was capable of relocating the controls in the following instances.  1) Stamtec, Punch Press #1 (Model-61-80/Serial No.-S001121) 2) Sutherland, Punch Press #2 (Model-FMP-110/Serial No.-5110190) 3) Sutherland, Punch Press #3 (Model-FMP-110/Serial No.-5110186) 4) Stamtec, Punch Press #4 (Model-G2-110/Serial No.-5001174) 5) ADIA, Punch Press #5 (Model-NC2-160(1)/Serial No.-10516-1727) 6) Stamtec, Punch Press #6 (Model-G2-250/Serial No.-S001207) 8) ADIA	Punch Press #8	(Model-NC2-250/Serial No.-10525-1396)  9) Stamtec, Punch Press #9 (Model-GS-250/ Serial No.-B03-S001296-A40546) 10) Stamtec, Punch Press #10 (Model-S2-600/Serial No.-A41132S001307) 11) Stamtec, Punch Press #11 (Model-G1-160/Serial No.-S70576) 12) Stamtec, Press #12 (Model-G1-160/Serial No.-S70590) 13) SEYI, Punch Press #14 (Model-SAG-660/Serial No.-D600-036) 14) Minster, Punch Press #18 (Model-O.B.I. NO.6/Serial No.-6-17574) 15) Stamtec, Punch Press #20 (Model-G1-80/Serial No.-S001076)
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8500
  • — Z (S) $11106

1910.217 B06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2024
Abate by
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(6)(i): Two-hand trip(s) on mechanical power press(es) using full revolution clutches did not have the individual operator's hand controls arranged by design and construction and/or separation to require the use of both hands to trip the press:  Production Floor:  On or about February 06, 2024, employees were exposed to caught-between/struck-by hazards in that the #T3, 20-Ton TOX-PRESSOTECHNIK (Type PCT-30-15) Hydraulic Press Punch Stamp Crimp did not have the two-hand trip controls protected against unintentional operation, and the controls were not arranged to require the use of both hands to trip the press.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 P06 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2024
Abate by
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(p)(6)(ii): Inspections were not made of belts, lacings, and fasteners and such equipment was not kept in good repair:  On or about February 06, 2024, the conveyor machines connected to Press #4 and #9 had conveyor belts which were torn and brittle, the conveyor machines were operated by a Baldor Industrial Motor (CAT No. CDP 3440, 3/4HP-1750 RPMs). This condition exposed employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.303 B01 IV

Other-than-serious 5 instances 45 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2024
Abate by
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $891 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1)(iv): Electric equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause serious physical harm to employees, such as damaged electrical insulation:  On or about February 06, 2024, employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards in that electrical cords were run through holes made on the sides of metal feeder boxes connected to the press(es) in the following instances.  1) On press #1, electrical cords run through the front of the feeder box had slight outer insulation damage.  2) On press #2, electrical cords run through the front of the feeder box had slight outer insulation damage.  3) On press #3, electrical cords run through the front of the feeder box had slight outer insulation damage.  4) On press #5, electrical cords run through the front of the metal feeder box had slight outer insulation damage.  5) On press #20, electrical cords run through the front and back of metal feeder box had slight outer insulation damage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $500
  • — Z (O) $891

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  Production Floor: On or about February 06, 2024, employees were exposed due to electrical shock hazards in that on Press #5 an electrical cable coming out of the feeder control unit switch had a broken strain relief.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Larsen Manufacturing's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347260788.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.