EL PASO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: LARSEN MANUFACTURING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LARSEN MANUFACTURING in 12150 ROJAS DR. SUITE E, EL PASO, TX 79936 (NAICS 332119). OSHA activity number 347260788.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LARSEN MANUFACTURING
- Site address
- 12150 ROJAS DR. SUITE E
- City
- EL PASO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79936
- Mailing
- 12150 ROJAS DR. SUITE E, EL PASO, TX 79936
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332119
- Employees
- 146
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- May 3, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $9,521 · Current $6,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable injury that could be prevented by such equipment. Production Floor: On or about February 06, 2024, employees were exposed to impact (eye) hazards in the following instances. 1) Press #3 Area, an employee was observed wearing prescription eyewear side shields, but the frames and lens were not American National Standards Institute (ANSI-Z87.1) rated safety eyewear. 2) On press #5, an employee was observed wearing prescription eyewear side shields, but the frames and lens were not American National Standards Institute (ANSI-Z87.1) rated safety eyewear. 3) Press #7 Area, an employee was observed wearing prescription eyewear side shields, but the frames and lens were not American National Standards Institute (ANSI-Z87.1) rated safety eyewear. 4) Press #10 Area, an employee was observed wearing prescription eyewear side shields, but the frames and lens were not American National Standards Institute (ANSI-Z87.1) rated safety eyewear. 5) Press #12 Area, an employee was observed wearing prescription eyewear side shields, but the frames and lens were not American National Standards Institute (ANSI-Z87.1) rated safety eyewear. 6) Press #18 Area, an employee was observed wearing prescription eyewear side shields, but the frames and lens were not American National Standards Institute (ANSI-Z87.1) rated safety eyewear. 7) Quality Control Room, an employee was observed wearing prescription eyewear side shields, but the frames and lens were not American National Standards Institute (ANSI-Z87.1) rated safety eyewear. 8) Tool Room: Four employees were observed wearing prescription eyewear side shields, but the frames and lens were not American National Standards Institute (ANSI-Z87.1) rated safety eyewear.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6000
- — Z (S) $9521
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- May 3, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $9,521 · Current $6,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposed an employee to injury, was not guarded: On or about February 06, 2024, in the Tool Room; point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded in the following instances. 1) Two Bridgeport Milling Machines were missing guards at the point of operation. 2) The Clausing Milling Machine was missing a guard at the point of operation. 3) The Profit Master Lathe Machine (Model 15X40/Serial #2713, 220V) was missing a guard at the point of operation. 4) The 18"Grob Vertical Band Saw (Model 4V-18, Serial #2826) was missing a guard at the point of operation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6000
- — Z (S) $9521
1910.212 A02
- Issued
- May 3, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(2): Guard(s) on machine(s) were not affixed to the machine or secured elsewhere when attachment to the machine was not possible. On or about February 06, 2024, the Willis-Microcut Milling Machine (Model 1050I, Serial #980821S, 220/440V 3 HP), had a flexible magnetic plexi-shield guard that was not affixed or secured to the machine. This condition exposed employees to impact/struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- May 3, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,760 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: Tool Room: On or about February 06, 2024, the 8" Dayton Bench Grinder (Model 4Z909C, 3/4 HP-3450-RPMs), the distance between the adjustable guard exceeded one-fourth inch. The measured distance between the adjustable tongue guard and wheel was 3/4 of an inch exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $4760
1910.217 C03 VIII D
- Issued
- May 3, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,106 · Current $8,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(3)(viii)(d): Two hand trip devices of mechanical power press(es) were not fixed in position so that only a supervisor or safety engineer was capable of relocating the controls: Production Floor: On or about June 6, 2023, employees were exposed to caught-between/struck-by hazards in that the two hand trip devices of mechanical power press(es) listed below were not fixed in position so that only a supervisor or safety engineer was capable of relocating the controls in the following instances. 1) Stamtec, Punch Press #1 (Model-61-80/Serial No.-S001121) 2) Sutherland, Punch Press #2 (Model-FMP-110/Serial No.-5110190) 3) Sutherland, Punch Press #3 (Model-FMP-110/Serial No.-5110186) 4) Stamtec, Punch Press #4 (Model-G2-110/Serial No.-5001174) 5) ADIA, Punch Press #5 (Model-NC2-160(1)/Serial No.-10516-1727) 6) Stamtec, Punch Press #6 (Model-G2-250/Serial No.-S001207) 8) ADIA Punch Press #8 (Model-NC2-250/Serial No.-10525-1396) 9) Stamtec, Punch Press #9 (Model-GS-250/ Serial No.-B03-S001296-A40546) 10) Stamtec, Punch Press #10 (Model-S2-600/Serial No.-A41132S001307) 11) Stamtec, Punch Press #11 (Model-G1-160/Serial No.-S70576) 12) Stamtec, Press #12 (Model-G1-160/Serial No.-S70590) 13) SEYI, Punch Press #14 (Model-SAG-660/Serial No.-D600-036) 14) Minster, Punch Press #18 (Model-O.B.I. NO.6/Serial No.-6-17574) 15) Stamtec, Punch Press #20 (Model-G1-80/Serial No.-S001076)
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $8500
- — Z (S) $11106
1910.217 B06 I
- Issued
- May 3, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(6)(i): Two-hand trip(s) on mechanical power press(es) using full revolution clutches did not have the individual operator's hand controls arranged by design and construction and/or separation to require the use of both hands to trip the press: Production Floor: On or about February 06, 2024, employees were exposed to caught-between/struck-by hazards in that the #T3, 20-Ton TOX-PRESSOTECHNIK (Type PCT-30-15) Hydraulic Press Punch Stamp Crimp did not have the two-hand trip controls protected against unintentional operation, and the controls were not arranged to require the use of both hands to trip the press.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.219 P06 II
- Issued
- May 3, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(p)(6)(ii): Inspections were not made of belts, lacings, and fasteners and such equipment was not kept in good repair: On or about February 06, 2024, the conveyor machines connected to Press #4 and #9 had conveyor belts which were torn and brittle, the conveyor machines were operated by a Baldor Industrial Motor (CAT No. CDP 3440, 3/4HP-1750 RPMs). This condition exposed employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.303 B01 IV
- Issued
- May 3, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $891 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1)(iv): Electric equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause serious physical harm to employees, such as damaged electrical insulation: On or about February 06, 2024, employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards in that electrical cords were run through holes made on the sides of metal feeder boxes connected to the press(es) in the following instances. 1) On press #1, electrical cords run through the front of the feeder box had slight outer insulation damage. 2) On press #2, electrical cords run through the front of the feeder box had slight outer insulation damage. 3) On press #3, electrical cords run through the front of the feeder box had slight outer insulation damage. 4) On press #5, electrical cords run through the front of the metal feeder box had slight outer insulation damage. 5) On press #20, electrical cords run through the front and back of metal feeder box had slight outer insulation damage.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $500
- — Z (O) $891
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- May 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws: Production Floor: On or about February 06, 2024, employees were exposed due to electrical shock hazards in that on Press #5 an electrical cable coming out of the feeder control unit switch had a broken strain relief.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Larsen Manufacturing
View Larsen Manufacturing's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332119)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347260788.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.