LEXINGTON, MA —
OSHA Inspection: COMPLETE RESTORATION & WATERPROOFING INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of COMPLETE RESTORATION & WATERPROOFING INC. in 60 BEDFORD ST, LEXINGTON, MA 02420 (NAICS 238390). OSHA activity number 347626541.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COMPLETE RESTORATION & WATERPROOFING INC.
- Site address
- 60 BEDFORD ST
- City
- LEXINGTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02420
- Mailing
- 200 LAFAYETTE ROAD, SALISBURY, MA 01952
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238390
- Employees
- 27
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $5,323 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Jobsite- 60 Bedford St, Lexington, MA On or about July 18, 2024, employees were exposed to health hazards associated with the additional physiological burden of wearing respirators when the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine each employee's ability to use a respirator before requiring use.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $5323
- — F (O) $5000
- — Z (S) $5323
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: Jobsite- 60 Bedford St, Lexington, MA On or about July 18, 2024, employees were exposed to health hazards associated using respirators that are not fit tested when the employer did not provide testing to ensure the respirator properly fits.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $8873
- — F (O) $0
- — Z (S) $8873
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $12,421 · Current $8,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment to be nade by a competnet person(s): Location- Jobsite 60 Bedford St, Lexington, MA a) On July 18, 2024, an employee was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 10 feet when standing on a built in trash compactor where fall protection was not used. b) On July 18, 2024, an employee was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 25 feet when walking on the roof of the building where fall protection was not used. c) On July 18, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees using handheld grinders performing tuckpointing were protected from being exposed to silica with the use of engineering controls, work practices, and reespiratory protections. The employer did not have a program to conduct and document frequent and regular inspections of their worksites to ensure that workers were protected from falls and exposure to silica.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $12421
- — F (O) $8000
- — Z (S) $12421
1926.1153 C01
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $12,421 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1):For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1 Location: 60 Bedford St, Lexington, MA On July 18, 2024, at the job site, the employer did not ensure that employees using handheld grinders were protected from being exposed to silica with the use of engineering controls, work practices and respiratory protections.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $12421
- — F (S) $0
- — Z (S) $12421
1926.1153 G01
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $12,421 · Current $8,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1):The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan: Jobsite- 60 Bedford St, Lexington, MA On or about July 18, 2024, employees were exposed to respirable crystalline silica dust hazards while utilizing handheld grinders performing tuckpointing activities where the employer had not established nor implemented a written exposure control plan.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $12421
- — F (O) $8000
- — Z (S) $12421
1926.1153 G04
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(4):The employer did not designate a competent person to make frequent and regular inspections of job sites, materials, and equipment to implement the written exposure control plan: Jobsite- 60 Bedford St, Lexington, MA On or about July 18, 2024, employees were exposed to respirable crystalline silica dust hazards while utilizing handheld grinders performing tuckpointing activities where the employer did not designated a competent person to make frequent and regular inspections of the job site.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $0
- — F (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.41 A01 I
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $1,774 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.41(a)(1)(i):The establishment had 20 or more employees but fewer than 250 employees at any time during the previous calendar year, and the establishment was classified in an industry listed in appendix A to subpart E of this part, and the employer did not electronically submit information from OSHA Form 300A Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses to OSHA or OSHA's designee by the specified date: Location: Complete Restoration and Waterproofing The employer failed to electronically submit information from the OSHA Form 300A Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses to OSHA by March 2, 2024, for the forms covering 2023.
Recent events (3)
- — C (O) $1774
- — F (O) $1000
- — Z (O) $1774
More inspections at Complete Restoration & Waterproofing INC.
View Complete Restoration & Waterproofing INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238390)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347626541.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.