SEDALIA, CO —
OSHA Inspection: SUMMIT SEALANTS, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SUMMIT SEALANTS, INC. in 7329 REYNOLDS DR., SEDALIA, CO 80135 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 347979056.
Watch Summit Sealants, INC. — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Summit Sealants, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SUMMIT SEALANTS, INC.
- Site address
- 7329 REYNOLDS DR.
- City
- SEDALIA
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80135
- Mailing
- 7329 REYNOLDS DR., SEDALIA, CO 80135
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327991
- Employees
- 250
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
18 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $10641.00 · Current $10641.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: a) On or about October 23, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure procedures were developed, documented and utilized that clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy as outlined in 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A) through 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D).
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $10641
- — C (S) $10641
- — Z (S) $10641
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i):The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: a) On or about October 23, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure was conducted at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The training program of the employer did not ensure that purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees, and did not include all the training elements listed under Items A-C of 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): a) On or about October 23, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure the employees had acquired the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls and the employer did not ensure that the training program included all the training elements listed under items A-C of 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i), in that the employees did not receive training on the recognition of hazardous energy sources including the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 D06
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(6): Prior to starting work on machines or equipment that had been locked out or tagged out, the authorized employee did not verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment had been accomplished: a) On or about January 16, 2025, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that the employee verified that isolation and deenergization of the machine had been accomplished prior to starting work on the diamond wire saw. b) On or about January 16, 2025, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that the employee verified that isolation and deenergization of the machine had been accomplished prior to starting work on the 3 ft. saw.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6384.00 · Current $3500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l). a) On or about October 23, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that employees operating "Big Bertha" Clark CY400 Forklift Truck, successfully completed training and evaluation specified in paragraph (l).
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $3500
- — C (S) $6384
- — Z (S) $6384
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1):Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s). a) On or about October 23, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure the Clark CY400 Forklift Truck also known as "Big Bertha" was not removed from service when found in need of repair, including but not limited to visible threading showing in the tires, no seatbelt, nails sticking out of the bottom of the seat, and unlabeled controls
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined at least daily before being placed in service. a) On or about January 16, 2025, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that the Big Bertha Clark CY400 Forklift, and the Case TAT0393060 were inspected daily before being placed in service.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.179 J01 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $12768.00 · Current $10000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(1)(ii): The employer did not perform frequent and periodic inspections as defined in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. a) On or about October 23, 2024, and at time prior, the employer did not ensure that frequent and periodic inspections were performed as defined in paragraphs (a)and (b) of this section for the overhead bridge crane on the west side of the building. b) On or about October 23, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that frequent and periodic inspections were performed as defined in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section for the overhead bridge crane on the east side of the building.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $10000
- — C (S) $12768
- — Z (S) $12768
1910.179 B05
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(b)(5):The rated load of crane(s) was not plainly marked on each side of the crane: a) On or about October 23, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that the overhead bridge crane on the west side was plainly marked on each side of the crane with the rated load of the crane. b) On or about October 23, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that the overhead bridge crane on the east side was plainly marked on each side of the crane with the rated load of the crane.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.179 L01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(l)(1): A preventive maintenance program based on the crane manufacturer's recommendations was not established: a) On or about October 23, 2024, and at time prior, the employer did not ensure that a preventive maintenance program based on the crane manufacturer's recommendations for the overhead bridge crane on the west side of the shop was established. b) On or about October 23, 2024, and at times prior the employer did not ensure that a preventive maintenance program based on the crane manufacturer's recommendations for the overhead bridge crane on the east side of the shop was established.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.179 L03 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(l)(3)(iii): Repairs or replacements were not provided promptly as needed for safe operation of crane(s): a) On or about October 23, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that repairs to the overhead bridge crane on the west side such as broken latches on the hook, the pin coming out of the hoist, and no rated load for the crane marked, were promptly conducted for safe operation of the crane b) On or about October 23, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that repairs to the overhead bridge crane on the east side such as broken latches on the hook and no rated load for the crane marked, were promptly conducted for safe operation of the crane.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.179 N04 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(n)(4)(i):The upper limit switch of each hoist was not tried out under no load, at the beginning of each operator's shift. a) On or about October 23, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that the upper limit switch of each hoist, the Demac and Detroit hoists located on the overhead bridge cranes on the east and west side of the shop, were tried out under no load at the beginning of each operator's shift.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.242 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6384.00 · Current $4000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(a): Hand and portable powered tools or equipment were not kept in safe condition:(a)(LOCATION)(IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)(DESCRIBE HAZARD(S) WHERE NECESSARY) a) On or about October 23, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that the two Makita portable grinders used to grind the stone, were provided with safety guards exposing employees to amputation and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $4000
- — C (S) $6384
- — Z (S) $6384
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $8511.00 · Current $8511.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) On or about October 23, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that the diamond wire saw was guarded to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards created by flying pieces from the diamond wire saw cutting stone, and the wire snapping. b) On or about October 23, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that the 3ft saw was guarded to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from the rotating gear shaft, and the ingoing nip points from the saw table moving along the rail.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $8511
- — C (S) $8511
- — Z (S) $8511
1910.219 F03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6384.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3):Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven (7) feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed: a) On or about January 16, 2025, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure the sprocket wheel and chain located near the legs of the operator under the control panel of the diamond wire saw was enclosed.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $6384
- — Z (S) $6384
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel: a) On or about October 23, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that the table mounted Dayton bench grinder, used by employees to sharpen chisels, had an adjustable tongue guard that was constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.215 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(d)(1): Wheel(s) on grinding machine(s) were not sounded (ring test) and inspected for damage before mounting. a) On or about January 16, 2025, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that the wheel on the table mounted bench grinder was ring tested before being mounted and used by employees.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.303 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident. a) On or about January 16, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer did not ensure that the electrical panel label inside the panel door, was legibly marked to indicate the purpose of the breaker labeled as "?".
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at SUMMIT SEALANTS, INC.
SEDALIA, CO—2026-01-21
SUMMIT SEALANTS, INC.
MONTROSE, CO—2025-07-29
SUMMIT SEALANTS, INC.
SEDALIA, CO—2024-10-23 00:00:00
SUMMIT SEALANTS, INC.
DENVER, CO—2020-12-30 00:00:00
SUMMIT SEALANTS, INC.
DENVER, CO—2019-01-24 00:00:00
SUMMIT SEALANTS, INC.
View SUMMIT SEALANTS, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327991)
EL CAJON, CA—2026-07-16
GRANITE AND MARBLE CONCEPTS INC.
MURFREESBORO, TN—2026-07-16
EUROSTONE LLC
SANTA CLARA, CA—2026-07-15
UNITED MARBLE & GRANITE
RED LION, PA—2026-07-14
FRANK'S MARBLE & GRANITE, LLC.
MODESTO, CA—2026-07-13
EXQUISITE STONE DESIGN
More inspections in CO
BROOMFIELD, CO—2026-07-16
WAVELYNX TECHNOLOGIES LLC
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO—2026-07-15
ELMER CONTRACTOR LLC
SHERIDAN, CO—2026-07-15
JOHN'S COLLISION REPAIR, INC.
CENTENNIAL, CO—2026-07-15
BRAKES PLUS, INC
ENGLEWOOD, CO—2026-07-15
PCL CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS INC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347979056.