STEINHATCHEE, FL —
OSHA Inspection: FLORIDA AIRBOAT PARTNERS LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of FLORIDA AIRBOAT PARTNERS LLC in 4033 SW HIGHWAY 358, STEINHATCHEE, FL 32359 (NAICS 336612). OSHA activity number 348316233.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FLORIDA AIRBOAT PARTNERS LLC
- Site address
- 4033 SW HIGHWAY 358
- City
- STEINHATCHEE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32359
- Mailing
- 4033 SW HIGHWAY 358, STEINHATCHEE, FL 32359
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336612
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Dec 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $2,128 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1):The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a. A fabricator working in the attachment bay area was exposed to a noise dose of 101.6%, or an equivalent dBA of 90.1 dBA, which was capable of causing permanent hearing loss. The sampling was performed for 522 minutes during one shift on June 18, 2025. The employer did not have a continuing, effective hearing conservation program. b. A fabricator working in the attachment bay area was exposed to a noise dose of 104.9%, or an equivalent dBA of 90.3 dBA, which was capable of causing permanent hearing loss. The sampling was performed for 524 minutes during one shift on June 18, 2025. The employer did not have a continuing, effective hearing conservation program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2128.2
- — Z (S) $3547
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Dec 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,128 · Current $1,277 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a. Powder Coating Area: On or about June 17, 2025, the employer exposed employees to potential respiratory hazards, in that the employer required the use of tight-fitting half face elastomeric respirators by powder coating employees without first providing a medical evaluation to determine if an employee was able to wear a respirator or not.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1276.8
- — Z (S) $2128
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Dec 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a. Powder Coating Area: On or about June 17, 2025, the employer exposed employees to potential respiratory hazards, in that employees were required to wear tight-fitting half face elastomeric respirators when powder coating without first being fit tested.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Dec 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A):Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: a. Powder Coating Area: On or about June 17, 2025, the employer exposed employees to potential respiratory hazards, in that employees were allowed to have facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the respirator facepiece and the face.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Dec 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1):The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii): a. Powder Coating Area: On or about June 17, 2025, the employer exposed employees to potential respiratory hazards, in that employees were required to wear a tight fitting half face elastomeric respirator without first being provided training as required by the standard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Florida Airboat Partners LLC
View Florida Airboat Partners LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336612)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348316233.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.