SLINGER, WI —
OSHA Inspection: RESIDENTIAL ROOFING LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RESIDENTIAL ROOFING LLC in 325 SANDSTONE STREET, SLINGER, WI 53086 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348325150.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RESIDENTIAL ROOFING LLC
- Site address
- 325 SANDSTONE STREET
- City
- SLINGER
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53086
- Mailing
- 2534 S. 11TH STREET, MILWAUKEE, WI 53215
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s). (a) On or about June 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that jobsite inspections were conducted to ensure plain view hazard were corrected. Hazards identified included but not limited to, employees not utilizing fall protection from the roof, incorrectly erected scaffolding equipment, employees not using correct personal protective equipment.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: (a) On or about June 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that eye protective equipment was used when employees were exposed to eye injury while using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.452 K05
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(5): Scaffold platforms were bridged on to another. (a) On or about June 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that ladder jack scaffolding being used on the south side of the jobsite were not bridged over one another where employees were working. Exposing employees to a fall of approximately 9 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. (a) On or about June 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees performing work from ladder jack scaffolding had been trained by a qualified person to recognize and minimize hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.602 C01 VIII A
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,256 · Current $4,256
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(viii)(A): The industrial truck was not equipped with a safety platform/cage firmly secured to the lifting carriage and/or forks when used for lifting personnel: (a) On or about June 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure employees standing on the metal platform was equipped with a safety platform/cage on Angus-Palm All-terrain forklift Model No. B8400. Exposing employees to fall hazard of approximately 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4256
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $21,281 · Current $21,281
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). (a) On or about June 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees installing underlayment on a residential property with a 10:12 pitch were protected from falling to the lower level, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 11.5 feet to the ground below. Residential Roofing, LLC. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1572879, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on May 2, 2022, with respect to a workplace located at 231 Four Winds Court, Hartland, WI 53029. Residential Roofing, LLC. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1572879, citation number 1, item number 1, group letter a, and was affirmed as a final order on June 24, 2023, with respect to a workplace located at 827 Marymere Drive, Oconomowoc, WI 53066.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $21281
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $8,512 · Current $8,512
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. (a) On or about June 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees working on the roof of the new residential home had access to a ladder that extended at least three feet above the upper landing or was secured to prevent displacement when used. Exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 11 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $8512
More inspections at Residential Roofing LLC
View Residential Roofing LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348325150.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.