STONE MOUNTAIN, GA —
OSHA Inspection: NEW WINCUP HOLDINGS, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of NEW WINCUP HOLDINGS, INC. in 4640 LEWIS ROAD, STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083 (NAICS 322219). OSHA activity number 348699208.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NEW WINCUP HOLDINGS, INC.
- Site address
- 4640 LEWIS ROAD
- City
- STONE MOUNTAIN
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30083
- Mailing
- 4640 LEWIS ROAD, STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30083
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 322219
- Employees
- 184
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A03
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2026
- Abate by
- Apr 27, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $12,769 · Current $7,661 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that walking-working surfaces are maintained free of hazards such as sharp or protruding objects, loose boards, corrosion, leaks, spills, snow, and ice. a) Cooling water tower /Outside of the building inside gate of the pit area - On or about October 6, 2025, the employer exposed employees troubleshooting equipment issues to slip and fall hazards in that, the employer failed to ensure that the walking-working surface between the pit and platform was dry as practicably possible.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7661.4
- — Z (S) $12769
1910.28 B06 I
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $16,550 · Current $9,930 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(6)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee less than 4 feet (1.2 m) above dangerous equipment is protected from falling into or onto the dangerous equipment by a guardrail system or a travel restraint system, unless the equipment is covered or guarded to eliminate the hazard. a) Cooling water tower /Outside of the building inside gate of the pit area - On or about October 6, 2025, the employer exposed employees troubleshooting equipment to fall, thermal and chemical burn hazards in that, the employer failed to ensure that an open pit was guarded to prevent employees from falling into the pit.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $9930
- — Z (S) $16550
1910.146 C03
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $10,214 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(3):When the employer decided its employees would not enter permit spaces, the employer did not take effective measures to prevent its employees from entering the permit spaces: a)Cooling water tower /Outside of the building inside gate of the pit area - On or about October 6, 2025, the employer exposed employees troubleshooting equipment and checking water levels to fall, thermal and chemical burn hazards, in that the employer failed to ensure that effective measures were taken to prevent employees from entering the permit spaces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $10214
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $16,550 · Current $9,930 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a) Outside of the building inside gate of the pit area - On or about October 6, 2025, the employer failed to ensure that suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body was provided for employees who were required to work around hazardous and corrosive chemicals, such as, but not limited to Sulfuric Acid.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $9930
- — Z (S) $16550
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $16,550 · Current $16,550
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet. a) Facility: On or about October 6, 2025, and at times prior to, employees troubleshooting equipment and checking water levels were exposed to chemical burns, in that the employer failed to compile and maintain an accurate list of hazardous chemicals known to be present at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $16550
- — Z (S) $16550
1910.1200 H03 III
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii):Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used: a) Facility: On or about October 6, 2025, and at times prior, employees troubleshooting equipment and checking water levels were exposed to chemical burns from chemicals such as, but not limited to Sulfuric Acid (corrosive) and Sodium Silicate, in that the employer failed to ensure that employees received effective training regarding hazards associated chemicals present in their work area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.29 B03
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2026
- Abate by
- Apr 27, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,553 · Current $1,532 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(3): Each recordable injury or illness was not entered on the OSHA 300 Log and/or an incident report (OSHA Form 301or equivalent) within seven (7) calendar days of receiving information that a recordable injury or illness has occurred: a) Facility - On January 20, 2026, the employer failed to ensure that a recordable injury and illness was recorded in their OSHA 300 logs for an injury that occurred on October 6, 2025. The employer became aware of the recordable injury on January 13, 2026.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1531.8
- — Z (O) $2553
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $12,769 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2):The employer did not report within 24-hours a work-related incident resulting in in-patient hospitalization, amputation or the loss of an eye. a) Facility - On or about January 14, 2026, the employer failed to report a work-related in patient hospitalization to OSHA within 24 hours. The in-patient hospitalization occurred on October 6, 2025 and the employer reported the hospitalization on January 16, 2026.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $12769
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2026
- Abate by
- Apr 27, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done: a) On January 30, 2026 the employer failed to identify the person certifying the hazard assessment and failed to date the certification.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at NEW Wincup Holdings, INC.
View NEW Wincup Holdings, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 322219)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348699208.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.