MEADVILLE, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: CHANNELLOCK, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CHANNELLOCK, INC. in 1306 SOUTH MAIN STREET, MEADVILLE, PA 16335 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 113339451.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CHANNELLOCK, INC.
- Site address
- 1306 SOUTH MAIN STREET
- City
- MEADVILLE
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 16335
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (Y)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3423
- Employees
- 577
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 25, 1992
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to perform tasks involving repetitive motions resulting in s that had caused, were causing, or were likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders: a. Final Inspection Department; employees are required to insert different types of pliers into plastic zip-lock type display packages (c-packs). This task requires high frequency, repetitive and forceful ulnar and radial deviation of the wrist. The evaluation of these tasks indicate that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal disorders. The employer did not implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such disorders. The injury and illness records for 1989, 1990, and 1991 documented a pattern of repetitive motion injuries. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to c this hazard is the implementation of an ergonomics management program consisting of the following four elements: 1. Worksite analysis to recognize the identify existing cumulative trauma disorders in the workplace. This analysis should include development and use of an ergonomic checklist and employee questionnaire. Periodic surveys of the worksite shall be conducted at least annually to evaluate work practices and engineering controls. Employee participation in the ergonomic program should be encouraged. 2. Medical management which includes accurate recordkeeping of CTDs. The program should address early recognition, evaluation, and referral of CTD cases, and should include conservative treatment and conservative return to work. Systematic worksite review by the medical team should also be included in the program. 3. Training and education for exposed employees, including methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the training. Re-training should be done annually, or as operations change. training should address hazards associated with the job, the risks of developing CTDs, symptoms of exposure, and how to prevent the occurrence of CTD. A supervisors' training program should also be implemented to allow recognition of the signs of CTDs and to reinforce the employer's ergonomic program. 4. Hazard prevention and control which includes engineering, work practice, and administrative controls, and personal protective equipment where relevant. a. Administrative controls are implemented which reduce the duration, frequency and severity of exposure to ergonomic stress. These controls may include job rotation, reduction of repetitioons, and preventative maintenance of related equipment. Personal protective equipment shall be evaluated to determine any contribution to ergonomic stress. b. Work practice controls are implemented which include proper work techniques, new employee conditioning, and monitoring and modifications as necessary to minimize ergonomic stressors. c. Engineering controls are designed by a qualified ergnomist and may include work station redesign, tool and handle redesign, and change of work methods. The goal of this program should be to make the job fit the person. Examples of engineering controls applicable to this workplace include: (i) Increase width of c-packs to ease the insertion of pliers into them. (ii) Use grease or oil on handles of pliers to reduce friction between rubber handgrips and plastic c-packs. (iii) Automate the packaging process to eliminate employee exposure. STEP 1: Implementation of an ergonomics program for worksite analysis, medical management, and training and education, as detailed in items 1-3 above. STEP 2: Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of the administrative, work practice and engineering controls as detailed in items 4a-4c. ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKPLACE CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DISORDERS. SIXTY (60) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. STEP 3: Implementation of administrative, work practice and engineering controls, as described in items 4a-4c
1910.94 D09 I
- Issued
- Nov 25, 1992
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $500 · Current $500
1910.94 D09 IV
- Issued
- Nov 25, 1992
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 1992
1910.94 D09 V
- Issued
- Nov 25, 1992
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 1992
1910.94 D09 VII
- Issued
- Nov 25, 1992
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 1992
1910.106 E02 IVD
- Issued
- Nov 25, 1992
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $500 · Current $500
1910.106 E06 I
- Issued
- Nov 25, 1992
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 1992
1910.106 E06 II
- Issued
- Nov 25, 1992
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 1992
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Nov 25, 1992
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Nov 25, 1992
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 1992
1910.1200 H02 IV
- Issued
- Nov 25, 1992
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 1992
More inspections at Channellock, INC.
View Channellock, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 113339451.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.