GILMAN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: THE GILMAN BROTHERS COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of THE GILMAN BROTHERS COMPANY in GILMAN ROAD, GILMAN, CT 06336 (NAICS 326140). OSHA activity number 311759021.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE GILMAN BROTHERS COMPANY
- Site address
- GILMAN ROAD
- City
- GILMAN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06336
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 38, GILMAN, CT 06336
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326140
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3086
- Employees
- 69
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
36 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm, including severe burns, to employees in that employees were exposed to dust explosions, deflagration, or other fire hazard from improperly designed dust collection equipment that was located inside of the building: Line 9: The Nelmor scrap collection units, conveying ducts, blower and dust collector had not been designed to handle combustible dust and was located inside of the building. Specifically: A.Segregation, separation or detachment was not used to provide employee protection from the explosion hazard created by the scrap collection system. Employees worked in close proximity to the scrap and dust collector. Also, the blue dust collector was not provided with a fire protection system. (NFPA 654, Section 6.2.1 and 7.13.1.2) B.Process equipment in the scrap collection system had not been provided with one or more required methods of explosion protection such as, oxidant concentration, deflagration venting, deflagration pressure containment, deflagration suppression systems, dilution, and/or deflagration venting through a listed/labeled device. (NFPA 654, Section 7.1.2.1) C.Isolation devices were not provided between pieces of equipment in the scrap collection system that were interconnected including the Nelmors, conveying duct, blower and dust collector. (NFPA 654, 7.1.4.1) D.The dust collector was located inside of the building, adjacent to a work area, surrounded by flammable foam board. The exhaust was vented to the general work area. (NFPA 654, Section 7.13.1.1.1) E.Interior surfaces where dust accumulations could occur were not designed or constructed to facilitate cleaning and to minimize combustible dust accumulations. (NFPA 654, Section 6.3.3) F.Regular cleaning frequencies were not established for walls, floors, and horizontal surfaces such as ducts, pipes, hoods, ledges, beams, etc... to minimize dust accumulations within operating areas of the plant. (NFPA 654, Section 8.2.1.2) Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is : A.Review the National Fire Proection Association (NFPA) Standard 654, Standard for the Prevention of Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing and Handling of Combustible Particulate Solids. B.Conduct a Process Hazard Anaylsis of the collection process. C.Depending on the placement of the dust collection system either inside of the building or outside of building, properly design the system to address potential fire and explosion hazards in accordance with established guidelines such as NFPA 654. D.Implement a schedule of regular housekeeping in all areas where combustible dust can be generated to prevent the accumulation of combustible dust on building and equipment surfaces. Abatement Note: Relevant portions of NFPA 654 are included for reference for abatement purposes.
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $1250.00
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.23 A04
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $625 Reduced
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $625.00
- — I (S) $625.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.24 F
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500.00
- — Z (S) $1000.00
1910.24 I
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2009
1910.36 A03
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500.00
- — Z (S) $1000.00
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2009
1910.37 A04
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2009
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2009
1910.119 C01
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $1250.00
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.119 D01
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $1250.00
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.119 E01
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $1250.00
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.119 F01 I
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $1250.00
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.119 G01 I
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 2011
Recent events (3)
- — P (S)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.119 H02 IV
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $1250.00
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.119 J02
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $1250.00
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.119 L01
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 2011
Recent events (3)
- — P (S)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $625.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $625.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500.00
- — Z (S) $1000.00
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $625.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $625.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.304 A02
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.304 G05
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 2009
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 2009
1910.304 G06 VI
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $625.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $625.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.305 G01 IV
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500.00
- — Z (S) $1000.00
1910.307 B
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $1250.00
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.333 A
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.333 B02 I
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 2009
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.22 B02
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.24 D
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2009
1910.110 B06 VI
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2009
1910.146 C02
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2009
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2009
More inspections at The Gilman Brothers Company
View The Gilman Brothers Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326140)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311759021.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.