Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: THE GILMAN BROTHERS COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of THE GILMAN BROTHERS COMPANY in 1 GILMAN ROAD, GILMAN, CT 06336 (NAICS 326150). OSHA activity number 343177556.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch The Gilman Brothers Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for The Gilman Brothers Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1 GILMAN ROAD
City
GILMAN
State
CT
ZIP
06336
Mailing
P.O. BOX 38, GILMAN, CT 06336
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326150
Employees
81
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 H07 I A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Nov 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,959 · Current $4,980 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(h)(7)(i)(a):  Precautions shall be taken to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors. Sources of ignition include but are not limited to open flames; lightning; smoking; cutting and welding; hot surfaces; frictional heat; static, electrical, and mechanical sparks; spontaneous ignition, including heat-producing chemical reactions; and radiant heat:    Area around Extruder:  On, or about, June 19, 2018, static electricity was generated from the production process that created potential ignition sources for the iso-butane, a Category 1 flammable liquid, that was off-gassed in the production area.  An ionizing unit was found to be not functional.  The company had not determined all potential areas where static could be present and had not taken effective steps to control the static charge.  Fires occurred in the process area on March 9, 2018 and May 29, 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4979.5
  • — Z (S) $9959

1910.106 H07 III A

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Oct 31, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,959 · Current $4,980 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(h)(7)(iii)(a): All electrical wiring and equipment shall be installed in accordance with subpart S of this part:  Area around Extruder:  On, or about, June 19, 2018, the following electrical equipment that was designed for use in non-classified locations was used in areas classified as Class 1, Division 2 using the classification method contained in National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)  Standard 497, Recommended Practice for the Classification of Flammable Liquids, Gases or Vapors and of Hazardous (Classified) Locations for Electrical Installations of Chemical Process Areas as required under 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(C).  On March 26, 2018, a fire occurred at the extruder outlet due to exposed heater wires:  A.    Area 4 (as identified on the Fuss & O"Neill 2011 classification document) Process Piping Between Pump Shed and Indoor Extruder.  The following equipment was located in the designated Class 1, Division 2 area:  1.  T27:  460 volt isolation transformer.   2.  T28:  460 volt isolation transformer.   3.  D90:  Harrell Melt Pump drive. 4.  T29:  Federal Pacific transformer.  5.  D91:  Harrel Extruder drive. 6.  T30:  HPS step down transformer.  7.   Raceway and various wiring under the extruder.      B.     Area 5 (as identified on the Fuss & O'Neill 2011 classification document) Indoor Extruder Area.  The following equipment was located in the designated Class 1, Division 2 area:  1.  Dayton fan.   2.   Dayton fan. 3.   T31 transformer. 4.   Duplex outlet.    5.   Blue/gray traverse motor. 6.   Dayton fan under web. 7.   Dayton fan under web.   8.   Extruder thermocouple wiring.      Abatement Note:  Under 29 CFR 1910.119(l)(1), Management of Change must be conducted because the blowing agent has changed from iso-pentane to iso-butane.  The classification recommendation may change as a result of the lower flash and boiling points of iso-butane and the recent history of fires in the process area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4979.5
  • — Z (S) $9959

1910.119 L01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Dec 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,959 · Current $4,980 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(1): The employer did not implement procedures to manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures, and changes to facilities that affect a covered process:   Facility:  On, or about, June 19, 2018, the company had not followed Management of Change procedures when the blowing agent was changed from iso-pentane to iso-butane.  Aspects of the process including, but not limited to, updating the Process Hazard Analysis, updating Process Safety Information, verifying/updating piping and relief design, verifying/updating Class 1areas, reviewing any impact on equipment on the process and verifying/updating Standard Operating Procedures were not addressed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4979.5
  • — Z (S) $9959

1910.119 J04 I

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Nov 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $35,570 · Current $17,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i): The employer did not perform inspection and tests on process equipment:  Facility:  On, or about, June 19, 2018, the company had not performed monthly inspections on the Draeger system to ensure that it was functioning properly and would shut down the iso-butane delivery system in the event of a leak or spill.    The Gilman Brothers Company was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health Standard, which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 909370, Citation Number 2, Item Number 1a and was affirmed as a Final Order on December 17, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at Gilman, Connecticut.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $17785
  • — Z (R) $35570

View The Gilman Brothers Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343177556.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.