LAKE CITY, PA —
OSHA Inspection: STERLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STERLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. in 10047 KEYSTONE DRIVE, LAKE CITY, PA 16423 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 311873459.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STERLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Site address
- 10047 KEYSTONE DRIVE
- City
- LAKE CITY
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 16423
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326199
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3089
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
19 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $650 Reduced
E200
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employmnent and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: A.) Sterling Technologies, Inc., Mixer Area - Employees were potentially exposed to dust explosion hazards and severe burn injuries due to a lack of dust control: 1.) In production areas that included but were not limited to, the Mixer Area, equipment was not in place to control fugitive dust emissions generated during the polyethylene resin loading, unloading, and mixing operations. ABATEMENT NOTE: Among other methods, feasible and acceptable means to correct the conditions noted in Instance A.) include but are not limited to: Complying with applicable requirements noted in NFPA 654 Standard for the Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling of Combustible Particulate Solids. B.) Sterling Technologies, Inc., Mixing Equipment - Employees were potentially exposed to dust explosion hazards and severe burn injuries due to a lack of maintenance: 1.) The Company did not develop an inspection, testing and maintenance program to ensure that the mixing equipment was maintained in a manner that would prevent dust explosion hazards and the hazards associated with the propagation of deflagrations, explosions, and flame fronts through equipment and machinery. ABATEMENT NOTE: Among other methods, feasible and acceptable means to correct the conditions noted in Instance B.) include but are not limited to: Complying with applicable requirements noted in NFPA 654 Standard for the Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling of Combustible Particulate Solids.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $650.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employmnent and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to hoist components that had not been incorporated into an inspection program and/or inspected: A.) Oven Area - Four (4) jib hoists, a Harrington 2-ton jib hoist, Budget 2-ton jib hoist, a Coffing 1/2-jib ton hoist, and a Coffing 2-ton jib hoist, did not have frequent (monthly) hook inspections with signed reports. B.) Oven Area - Four (4) jib hoists, a Harrington 2-ton jib hoist, Budget 2-ton jib hoist, a Coffing 1/2-jib ton hoist, and a Coffing 2-ton jib hoist, did not have frequent (monthly) chain inspections with signed reports. C.) Oven Area -Four (4) jib hoists, a Harrington 2-ton jib hoist, Budget 2-ton jib hoist, a Coffing 1/2-jib ton hoist, and a Coffing 2-ton jib hoist, did not have frequent (monthly) running rope inspections with signed reports. ABATEMENT NOTE: Among other methods, feasible and acceptable means to correct the condition include but are not limited to: 1.) Complying with the Manufacturer's / Owner's Manuals recommendations for frequent and periodic inspections for each type of hoist used, and following a program of frequent and periodic inspections of the hoists in accordance with ASME B30.16 Overhead Hoists; 2.) Conducting hook, chain, and running rope inspections for each hoist; 3.) Developing an inspection schedule based on use and conditions outlined in the Manufacturer's / Owner's Manuals and ASME B30.16; 4.) Documenting the inspections referenced above.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $400.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $450.00
1910.37 A02
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $400.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
1910.120 Q01
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $450.00
1910.38 B
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2009
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $550 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $550.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2009
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2009
1910.333 B02 I
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2009
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $480 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $480.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2009
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2009
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $450
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2009
1910.303 G01 IB
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $450
1910.303 G01 II
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2009
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2009
1910.184 E03 II
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2009
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2009
More inspections at Sterling Technologies, INC.
View Sterling Technologies, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326199)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311873459.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.