Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: STERLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STERLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. in 10047 KEYSTONE DRIVE, LAKE CITY, PA 16423 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 311873459.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sterling Technologies, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sterling Technologies, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10047 KEYSTONE DRIVE
City
LAKE CITY
State
PA
ZIP
16423
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
SIC code (legacy)
3089
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

19 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Sep 30, 2009
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $650 Reduced

Hazardous substances E200

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employmnent and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that:
A.) Sterling Technologies, Inc., Mixer Area - Employees were potentially
exposed to dust
explosion hazards and severe burn injuries due to a lack of dust control:
1.) In production areas that included but were not limited to, the Mixer
Area, equipment was
not in place to control fugitive dust emissions generated during the
polyethylene resin loading,
unloading, and mixing operations.
ABATEMENT NOTE:
Among other methods, feasible and acceptable means to correct the
conditions noted in Instance
A.) include but are not limited to:
Complying with applicable requirements noted in NFPA 654 Standard for the
Prevention of
Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling
of
Combustible Particulate Solids.
B.) Sterling Technologies, Inc., Mixing Equipment - Employees were
potentially exposed to dust
explosion hazards and severe burn injuries due to a lack of maintenance:
1.) The Company did not develop an inspection, testing and maintenance
program to ensure that
the mixing equipment was maintained in a manner that would prevent dust
explosion hazards and
the hazards associated with the propagation of deflagrations, explosions,
and flame fronts
through equipment and machinery.
ABATEMENT NOTE:
Among other methods, feasible and acceptable means to correct the
conditions noted in Instance
B.) include but are not limited to:
Complying with applicable requirements noted in NFPA 654 Standard for the
Prevention of
Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling
of
Combustible Particulate Solids.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $650.00
  • — Z (S) $750.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 02 4 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Sep 22, 2009
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $400 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employmnent and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to hoist components that had not been incorporated into an
inspection program
and/or inspected:
A.) Oven Area - Four (4) jib hoists, a Harrington 2-ton jib hoist, Budget
2-ton jib hoist, a
Coffing 1/2-jib ton hoist, and a Coffing 2-ton jib hoist, did not have
frequent (monthly) hook
inspections with signed reports.
B.) Oven Area - Four (4) jib hoists, a Harrington 2-ton jib hoist, Budget
2-ton jib hoist, a
Coffing 1/2-jib ton hoist, and a Coffing 2-ton jib hoist, did not have
frequent (monthly) chain
inspections with signed reports.
C.) Oven Area -Four (4) jib hoists, a Harrington 2-ton jib hoist, Budget
2-ton jib hoist, a
Coffing 1/2-jib ton hoist, and a Coffing 2-ton jib hoist, did not have
frequent (monthly) running
rope inspections with signed reports.
ABATEMENT NOTE:
Among other methods, feasible and acceptable means to correct the
condition include but are
not limited to:
1.) Complying with the Manufacturer's / Owner's Manuals recommendations
for frequent and
periodic inspections for each type of hoist used, and following a program
of frequent and
periodic inspections of the hoists in accordance with ASME B30.16 Overhead
Hoists;
2.) Conducting hook, chain, and running rope inspections for each hoist;
3.) Developing an inspection schedule based on use and conditions outlined
in the
Manufacturer's / Owner's Manuals and ASME B30.16;
4.) Documenting the inspections referenced above.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $400.00
  • — Z (S) $600.00

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Aug 21, 2009
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $350.00
  • — Z (S) $450.00

1910.37 A02

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Aug 21, 2009
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $400.00
  • — Z (S) $600.00

1910.120 Q01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Sep 22, 2009
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $350.00
  • — Z (S) $450.00

1910.38 B

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Sep 22, 2009

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Sep 22, 2009
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $550 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $550.00
  • — Z (S) $750.00

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Sep 22, 2009

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Sep 22, 2009

1910.333 B02 I

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Aug 21, 2009

1910.157 E02

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Aug 21, 2009
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $480 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $480.00
  • — Z (S) $600.00

1910.157 E03

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Aug 21, 2009

1910.157 G01

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Sep 22, 2009

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Aug 21, 2009
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $450

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Sep 8, 2009

1910.303 G01 IB

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Aug 21, 2009
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $450

1910.303 G01 II

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Aug 21, 2009

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Sep 22, 2009

1910.184 E03 II

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2009
Abate by
Sep 8, 2009

View Sterling Technologies, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311873459.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.