Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: SABINA FARMERS EXCHANGE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SABINA FARMERS EXCHANGE, INC. in 700 MIAMI STREET, URBANA, OH 43078 (NAICS 311119). OSHA activity number 331094102.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sabina Farmers Exchange, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sabina Farmers Exchange, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
700 MIAMI STREET
City
URBANA
State
OH
ZIP
43078
Mailing
292 NORTH HOWARD STREET, SABINA, OH 45169
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311119
Employees
10
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2012
Abate by
Feb 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1):  Every open-sided floor or platform 4 feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level was not guarded by a standard railing (or the equivalent as specified in paragraph (e)(3) of this section) on all open sides and railings were not provided with a toeboard where required:    a)  The first landing of the stairs to the attic was approximately ten feet above the first floor of the building and was not guarded by a railing to prevent employees from falling over the side.    b)  The railing around the walkway of the second level of the attic was not protected by a toe board.    c)  The walkway to the third level of the attic was approximately five stories tall, was not guarded by a standard railing, and the floor boards appeared to not be permanently attached to the supports below them.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $5390

1910.272 J01

Serious Gravity 10 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2012
Abate by
Jan 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.272(j)(1):  The employer did not develop and implement a written housekeeping program that established the frequency and the method(s) determined best to reduce accumulations of fugitive grain dust on ledges, floors, equipment, and other exposed areas.      (a)  On or about November 22, 2011 the employer did not have a housekeeping program in place for the Urbana, OH feed mill where fugitive grain dust had accumulated on beams, ledges, floors and equipment in the basement and attics area of the building.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $5390

1910.1001 J02 I

Serious Gravity 10 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2012
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(2)(i):  The building owner or facility owner did not determine the presence, location, and quantity of presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM) and/or other asbestos-containing material (ACM) at the work site:    On or about November 22, 2011 the building owner who had purchased the building in 2005, had not exercised due dilligence by determining the presence, location and quantity of PACM/ACM in the facility, which included:    (a)  Insulation on a pipe, approximately six feet above the floor, along the wall near the boiler room in the basement, which contained 40% asbestos;    (b)  Insulation on a fill tank, approximately four feet above the floor, outside the boiler room in the basement, near the grinder, which contained 66% asbestos;    (c)  Insulation on a fat tank, approximately eight feet tall and ten feet long, in the basement, near the mixer, which contained 10% asbestos;    (d)  Insulation on a pipe, approximately six feet above the floor, outside the boiler room in the basement, near the grinder, which contained 2% asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $5390

1910.1001 J02 III

Serious Gravity 10 50 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2012
Abate by
Jan 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(2)(iii):  The building owner or facility owner did not inform employers of employees who performed housekeeping activities of the presence and location of asbestos containing material (ACM) or presumed asbestos containing material (PACM) in such areas that may be contacted during such activities:    On or about November 22, 2011 the building owner who had purchased the building in 2005, had not exercised due dilligence by notifying employees who performed housekeeping activities in areas that contained combustible grain dust of the presence and location of PACM/ACM in the facility, which included:    (a)  Insulation on a pipe, approximately six feet above the floor, along the wall near the boiler room in the basement, which contained 40% asbestos;    (b)  Insulation on a fill tank, approximately four feet above the floor, outside the boiler room in the basement, near the grinder, which contained 66% asbestos;    (c)  Insulation on a fat tank, approximately eight feet tall and ten feet long, in the basement, near the mixer, which contained 10% asbestos;    (d)  Insulation on a pipe, approximately six feet above the floor, outside the boiler room in the basement, near the grinder, which contained 2% asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $5390

1910.1001 J07 III C

Serious Gravity 10 50 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2012
Abate by
Jan 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(7)(iii)(C):  The employer did not ensure that each employee was informed of the quantity, location, manner of use, release, and storage of asbestos and the specific nature of operations which could result in exposure to asbestos:    (a)  On or about November 22, 2011 the employer had not ensured that each employee was informed of the presence of friable asbestos insulation on old pipes and tanks in the basement of the facility and how asbestos fibers could be released during maintenance activities on equipment located near the ACM or by sweeping and cleaning which was done to prevent the build up of combustible grain dust on a daily basis.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $5390

1904.30 A

Deleted Other-than-serious 50 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2012
Abate by
Jan 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $770 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.30(a):  The employer did not maintain a separate OSHA 300 Log for each establishment that was expected to be in operation for one year or longer.    (a)  The employer did not maintain a separate OSHA 300 log for the Urbana facility of Sabina Farmers Exchange, Inc., where Premier Feeds had been in mixed and sold since 2005.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $770

View Sabina Farmers Exchange, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331094102.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.