Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,288Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-24 Last loaded 2026-07-29

OSHA Inspection: DH STEEL PRODUCTS, LLC

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of DH STEEL PRODUCTS, LLC in 2420 WEST 15TH STREET, ERIE, PA 16505 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 339828444.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch DH Steel Products, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for DH Steel Products, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2420 WEST 15TH STREET
City
ERIE
State
PA
ZIP
16505
Mailing
2420 WEST 15TH STREET, ERIE, PA 16505
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238120
Employees
31
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Jun 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,000 Reduced
1910.107(d)(2): Spraying areas were not provided with mechanical ventilation adequate to remove flammable vapors, mists, or powders to a safe location and to confine and control combustible residues so that life was not endangered:       a.) Spraying Area- On or about, and dates prior to, June 27, 2014 mechanical ventilation was not adequate to remove flammable vapors and mists, and to confine and control combustible residues, where a flammable primer(Corotech Shop Primer) was sprayed, as evidenced by the quantity of dried overspray present in the spray area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.107 G02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Feb 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2): All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary:      a.) Spraying Area- On or about, and dates prior to, June 27, 2014 deposits of combustible residue had accumulated on the floor of the spray area where a flammable primer (Corotech Shop Primer) was sprayed. Condition created a potential fire/explosion hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 E02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Jun 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(e)(2): The quantity of flammable or combustible liquids kept in the vicinity of spraying operation(s) exceeded the minimum required for operation:    a.) Spraying Area- On or about, July 18, 2014, ten 5-gallon containers of Corotech Shop Primer were stored inside the spray area. Approximately two 5-gallon containers of the paint were used each day.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Feb 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(2): An open flame or spark producing equipment was present in the spraying area or within 20 feet thereof and not separated by a partition.    a.) Spraying Area- On or about, and dates prior to, July 18, 2014, smoking was permitted in an area where a flammable primer (Corotech Shop Primer) was being sprayed. Employees were observed smoking during application of the product.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Feb 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine an employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a)  DH Steel Products, LLC - On or about 6/27/14 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide medical evaluations for employees voluntarily utilizing Binks brand 40-128 tight-fitting, air purifying respirators during spraying operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Feb 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:      a.) DH Steel Products, LLC, On or about 6/27/14 and at times prior thereto, painters voluntarily utilized Bink brand tight-fitting, air-purifying respirators during spraying operations. The employer had not developed and implemented a worksite specific written Respiratory Protection Program for voluntary users.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Feb 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:    a)  DH Steel Products, LLC - On or about 6/27/14 and at times prior thereto, painters voluntarily utilizing Binks brand 40-128 tight-fitting, air purifying respirators during spraying operations were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Feb 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 068925872590

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a.) DH Steel Products, LLC, - On or about June 27, 2014, and at times prior thereto:  Company employees worked with and around hazardous substances including, but not limited to, xylene, welding fumes and chromium (VI). The written Hazard Communication program provided by the company was not worksite specific.  Information contained in the written program that was not worksite specific included, but was not limited to the following:      1.) Program stated Safety Officer was responsible for maintaining the chemical list; however, the company does not employ a Safety Officer, at the facility;    2.) Program stated Material Safety Data Sheets would be kept in the Foremans truck or job trailer; however, no such locations exist at the facility;    3.) Program stated Job Foreman would be responsible for ensuring contractors have access to information on the hazardous chemicals at the jobsite; however, company does not employ a Job Foreman at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Feb 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 068925872590

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    a.) DH Steel Products, LLC, - On or about June 27, 2014, and at times prior thereto:  Company employees worked with and around hazardous substances including, but not limited to, xylene, welding fumes and Chromium (VI). The Company had not provided employees with effective information and training about hazardous chemicals in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1026 D02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Feb 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0691

29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(i): The employer did not perform initial monitoring to determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure to chromium (VI) for each employee on the basis of a sufficient number of personal breathing zone air samples to accurately characterize full shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area:   a.) DH Steel Products, LLC - On or about 7/18/14, a Welder was exposed to 0.15 ug/m3 of Hexavalent Chromium (Chromium VI), as an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA), while welding n stainless steel.  The exposure level was derived from one sample collected over 463 minutes and assumed zero exposure for the remaining work shift.  The Company had not previously determined 8-hour TWA exposures for employees potentially exposed to Chromium VI.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View DH Steel Products, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339828444.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.