ANNISTON, AL ·
OSHA Inspection: U.S. ARMY MATERIAL COMMAND
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of U.S. ARMY MATERIAL COMMAND in TANK AUTOMOTIVE & ARMAMENT COMMAND ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT, ANNISTON, AL 36201 (NAICS 336992). OSHA activity number 339857930.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- U.S. ARMY MATERIAL COMMAND
- Site address
- TANK AUTOMOTIVE & ARMAMENT COMMAND ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT
- City
- ANNISTON
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36201
- Mailing
- 7 FRANKFORD AVENUE ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT, BUILDING 199, ANNISTON, AL 36201
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336992
- Employees
- 2900
- Ownership type
- Federal government (D)
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1960.8 A
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1960.8(a): The Agency head did not furnish employment and a place of employment to each employee that were free from recognized hazards that caused or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards: (a) On or about 7/15/14 - at Building 102, employees working on top of a Stryker vehicle were not protected from falling about 8-feet at the sides and back and 6-feet at the front. (b) On or about 7/15/14 - at Building 103, employees working on top of a Stryker vehicle were not protected from falling about 8-feet at the sides and back and 6-feet at the front.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards: Note: Toeboards are only required when persons can pass, there is moving equipment or there is equipment with which falling materials could create a hazard. (a) On or about 7/15/14 - at 400 Machine Shop, the platform at the Cincinnati Gilbert Horizontal Boring Mill was about 4-feet 10-inches above the floor and not guarded.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to items of this section: (a) On or about 7/15/14 - at Building 5 Machine Shop & Weld, the L2573 Water Jet Lockout Procedure did not outline the rules and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy. (b) On or about 7/15/14 - at Building 5 Machine Shop & Weld, the L4951 Plasma Cutter Lockout Procedure did not outline the rules and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy. (c) On or about 7/15/14 - at Building 145, the energy control procedures for vertical and horizontal machining centers, such as but not limited, to L5190 Monarch PMC V750 Lockout Procedure did not outline the rules and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy. (d) On or about 7/15/14 - at Building 147, the energy control procedures for lathes, such as but not limited, to HAAS Lathe CNC L6178 Lockout Procedure did not outline the rules and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.147 D01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1): The authorized employee did not have knowledge of the type and magnitude of the energy, the hazards of the energy to be controlled, and the method or means to control the energy before the authorized or affected employee turned off the machine or equipment: (a) On or about 7/15/14 - at Building 5 Machine Shop & Welding, the L2573-Water Jet Lockout Procedure did not address the type and magnitude of the energy, the hazards of the energy to be controlled, and the method or means to control the energy.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: (a) On or about 7/15/14 - at Building 5 Machine Shop & Weld, the employer did not conduct a periodic inspection at least annually. (b) On or about 7/15/14 - at Building 128A Millwright Shop, the employer did not conduct a periodic inspection at least annually.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: (a) On or about 7/15/14 - at Building 5 Machine Shop & Welding, a procedure was not utilized to control hazardous energy when employees are cleaning the Jet Edge water jet exposing employees to struck-by and caught-in hazards. The U.S. Army Materiel Command was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315969147, citation number 01, item number 001 and was affirmed as a final order on 2/16/12, with respect to a workplace located at 7 Frankford Ave, Bldg 16, Army Depot, Anniston, AL 36201.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (R) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) On or about 7/15/14 - at Building 5 Machine Shop & Weld, the unused portion of the Spartan vertical band saw blade under the table was not guarded. (b) On or about 7/15/14 - at Building 5 Sheet Metal, the small roller machine was not guarded. (c) On or about 7/15/14 - at Building 5 Sheet Metal, the large roller machine was not guarded. (d) On or about 7/15/14 - at Building 5 Sheet Metal, the punch press was not guarded. (e) On or about 7/15/14 - at Building 400 Machine Shop, the unused portion of the Spartan horizontal band saw blade adjacent to the control station was not guarded. The U.S. Army Materiel Command was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315969147, citation number 01, item number 002 and was affirmed as a final order on 2/16/12, with respect to a workplace located at 7 Frankford Ave, Bldg 16, Army Depot, Anniston, AL 36201.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (R) $0
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A Log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent), was not completed in detail as required by the regulation: (a) On or about 7/15/14 - at 7 Franklin Ave., Anniston, AL, the log of recordable work-related injuries and illnesses was not completed in the detail as required, such as but not limited to, identifying if the case as an injury or the type of illness.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
1904.32 B01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(b)(1): The employer did not extensively review the OSHA 300A Annual Summary to ensure that entries are correct and complete: (a) On or about 7/15/14 - at 7 Franklin Ave., Anniston, AL, the employer did not accurately review or correct the Injury and Illness log prior to being signed by a company executive, such as but not limited to, the total number of cases with job transfer or restriction was not provided, total number of days of job transfer or restriction was not provided, and hearing loss cases reported on the OSHA 300A Annual Summary were not recorded on the OSHA 300 log for the calendar year 2013.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
1904.32 B03
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(b)(3): The person who certified the annual summary was not a company executive as defined in 29 CFR 1904.32(b)(4): (a) On or about 7/15/14 - at 7 Franklin Ave., Anniston, AL, the OSHA 300A Annual Summary was not certified by a company executive as defined in 29 CR 1904.32(b)(4) or alternately in 29 CFR 1960.67 for the calendar year 2013.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): (a) On or about 7/15/14 - at 7 Franklin Ave., Anniston, AL, employee certification cards showed that the certification periods varied from about 4.5 to 9 years.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at U.S. Army Material Command
View U.S. Army Material Command's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336992)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339857930.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.