Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: IMPERIAL INDUSTRIES INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of IMPERIAL INDUSTRIES INC. in 505 INDUSTRIAL PARK AVE., ROTHSCHILD, WI 54474 (NAICS 332420). OSHA activity number 340077817.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Imperial Industries INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Imperial Industries INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
505 INDUSTRIAL PARK AVE.
City
ROTHSCHILD
State
WI
ZIP
54474
Mailing
P.O. BOX 1685, WAUSAU, WI 54402
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332420
Employees
192
Ownership type
Private (A)

14 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 25 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2015
Abate by
Jun 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,500 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were exposed to fall hazards:    (a)  Employees in Building #3-Industrial Parts were utilizing an extension ladder incorrectly by only utilizing one half of the ladder when it specifically stated it was not to be used independently.  Additionally, the top section of the ladder was cut to a shorter size and the bottom section of the ladder had structural damage.    (b)  Employees in Building #3-Upper and Lower bays separated self-supporting fiberglass ladders to use as single ladders.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $2500
  • · C (S) $4500
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.178 A04

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2015
Abate by
Jun 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications or additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial trucks were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:  (a)  The employer utilized unapproved extendable boom attachments in the industrial upper bay of building #3 that did not have a load chart, weight, labeling, or the forklift manufacturer's approval.    (b)  The employer utilized unapproved plate basket attachments in the industrial upper bay of building #3 to move tank sections without the forklift manufacturer's approval.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $6300
  • · C (S) $6300
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.178 A06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2015
Abate by
Jun 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were not maintained in a legible condition:  The employer did not ensure the nameplates on the Hyster #4 and Clark #5 forklifts were maintained in a legible condition.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 M02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2015
Abate by
Jun 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(2): Employee(s) stood under or passed under the elevated portion of a powered industrial truck(s)    Employees in the industrial upper bay of building #3 worked under the plate basket resting on the elevated forks of a power industrial truck to weld the seam of a tank section after it was rolled through the roll former, exposing employees to crushed by and struck by hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $2500
  • · C (S) $4500
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.178 M05 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2015
Abate by
Jun 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(5)(iii): Powered industrial truck(s), with the operator dismounted and within 25 feet of the truck still in his view, did not have the load engaging means fully lowered:  Forklift operators in the industrial upper bay of building #3 dismounted from the powered industrial truck and worked under the plate basket resting on the elevated forks  to weld the seam of a tank section after it was rolled through the roll former without fully lowering the load engaging means.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2015
Abate by
Jun 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  A Messer PlateMaster CNC operated plasma cutter located in Building #1-Guardrails/Plasma Cutter room did not have any method of machine guarding to prevent employees from being exposed to crushed by and struck by hazards created by the carriage movement.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $4500
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.212 A03 II

Other-than-serious 7 instances 12 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2015
Abate by
Jun 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    (a)  A Pacific hydraulic brake press located in Building #3-Industrial Parts did not have effective machine guarding to prevent the operator from accessing the point of operation.  The press was equipped light curtains; however they were positioned above the point of operation, exposing the operator to the pinch point between the dies.    (c)  A Hassleholm PS-310 roll-forming machine located in Building #3-Industrial Parts did not have machine guarding to prevent the operator from accessing the ingoing nip point created by the point of operation between the rollers.       (d)  A Hydrapower SH3014 shear located in Building #3-Industrial Upper Bay did not have adequate machine guarding to prevent the operator from accessing the pinch point created by the point of operation and material clamps.      (e)  A Hassleholm PS-205 roll-forming machine located in Building #5 did not have machine guarding to prevent the operator from accessing the ingoing nip point created by the point of operation between the rollers.      (f)  A Sertom flanging machine located in Building #6-Head Machine Room did not have machine guarding to prevent the operator from accessing the ingoing nip point created by the point of operation between the flanging rollers.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $2450
  • · C (S) $6300
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.303 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:    Sufficient access and working space was not provided for an electrical panel located in Building #3-Industrial Parts directly behind the Pullmax duplicator machine.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $1750
  • · C (S) $4500
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.305 B01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:    Unused openings in an electrical panel located in Building #3-Industrial Parts were not closed, exposing electrical conductors to dust and debris.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.305 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $4,500
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(i): Openings through which conductors entered cutout boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:  Conductors entering an electrical box under the sheet table for the roll former in Building #3-Industrial Upper Bay were exposed to abrasion as the fitting was not effectively closed.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $4500
  • · C (S) $4500
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.305 G01 IV

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv): Flexible cords and/ or cables were used for purposes prohibited by paragraphs (A) through (F) of 29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv):    (a)  An extension cord in Building #3 Industrial Tool Room was ran through the wall to charge PAPR pumps.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $2500
  • · C (S) $4500
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.334 A02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(ii): There was a defect or evidence of damage that could have exposed an employee to injury and the defective or damaged item was not removed from service:  An extension cord located in Building #3 Industrial Parts was not removed from service after the insulation became damaged with bent internal conductors.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2015
Abate by
Jun 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:    Maintenance personnel exposed to potential electrical hazards while troubleshooting equipment were not trained to use the required personal protective equipment appropriate for the specific parts of the body exposed.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $2500
  • · C (S) $4500
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.335 A01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2015
Abate by
Jun 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not using electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed:  Maintenance personnel troubleshooting electrical equipment and machinery were working in areas with the potential of electrical hazards without utilizing any form of personal protective equipment.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Imperial Industries INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340077817.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.