BRISTOL, CT —
OSHA Inspection: THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY in 158 CRONIN AVENUE, BRISTOL, CT 06010 (NAICS 221122). OSHA activity number 340665413.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY
- Site address
- 158 CRONIN AVENUE
- City
- BRISTOL
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06010
- Mailing
- 107 SELDEN STREET, BERLIN, CT 06037
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 221122
- Employees
- 1083
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970, Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards: Jobsite located at 158 Cronin Avenue, Forestville, Connecticut: On, or about, May 4, 2015, an employee was instructed to use a portable step ladder to reach the top of tank trailer 96545 in order to open/close the vent hatch. The employee had to reach over the side of the ladder in order to perform the task.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $5500
- — Z (S) $5500
1910.146 C02
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces: Jobsite located at 158 Cronin Avenue, Forestville, Connecticut: On, or about, May 4, 2015, the 12A-2T-2 circuit breaker tanks were not marked or labeled as permit required confined spaces. The tanks had a potential for atmospheric hazards, mechanical hazards, hazards related to the internal configuration and a sloped bottom surface.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.146 G01
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1): The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146: Jobsite located at 158 Cronin Avenue, Forestville, Connecticut: On, or about, May 4, 2015, the company had not provided effective training to employees whose job duties required entry into permit required confined spaces. Although Supervisors and field employees possessed a basic awareness of confined spaces, they had limited working knowledge of the requirements of the OSHA regulation and of the company's internal procedure TD955 entitled Confined Space Requirements.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 C04
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4): When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146: Jobsite located at 158 Cronin Avenue, Forestville, Connecticut: On, or about, May 4, 2015, employees were directed to work inside of circuit breaker enclosure tanks in order to replace bushings. Although the employer had developed a written permit required confined space program, Procedure TD 955 Confined Space Requirements, the program was not implemented in the field.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.269 C
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.269(c): The employee in charge did not conduct an adequate job briefing with the employees involved before they started each job, including at least the following subjects: hazards associated with the job, work procedures involved, special precautions, energy source controls, and personal protective equipment requirements: Jobsite located at 158 Cronin Avenue, Forestville, Connecticut: On, or about, May 4, 2015, a work crew was assigned to the Forestville substation to replace three bushings on an oil filled circuit breaker, 12A-2T-2. The work involved removed the oil from the tank enclosures, locking out the interrupter mechanism and entering a permit required confined space. The employer did not conduct an adequate job briefing prior to dispatching the crew and did not provide enough information to the crew to conduct adequate Tailboard job briefings on site. A. The employer did not provide adequate work procedures to properly lockout the circuit breaker energy sources. The correct Instruction Book was not provided and the proper method to isolate the energy sources was not reviewed. Also, testing procedures after the replacement was complete were not reviewed. B. The employer did not review and/or ensure that employees understood the company's confined space procedures, including informing employees that the space was a permit required confined space, procedures to be followed to evaluate the space and the proper documentation that needed to be completed and retained.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $3500
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.146 C07 III
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(7)(iii): The employer did not document the basis for determining that all hazards in a permit space had been eliminated, through a written certification that contained the date, the location of the space, and the signature of the person making the determination: Jobsite located at 158 Cronin Avenue, Forestville, Connecticut: On, or about, May 5, 2015, employees were directed to work inside of a circuit breaker tank enclosure to replace bushings. The entry was made as a non-permit confined space entry once the atmosphere was tested and the interrupter mechanism was lockout out. The interior configuration of the tank including component obstructions and the slope of the floor as well as the presence of oil on all the exposed surfaces was not evaluated and addressed as potential hazards. The employer did not document the basis for determining that all hazards in the space had been eliminated before entering under a non-permit classification.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $7000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.146 E06
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(e)(6): The employer did not retain each canceled entry permit for at least one year to facilitate the review of the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(14): Jobsite located at 158 Cronin Avenue, Forestville, Connecticut: On, or about, June 15, 2015, the employer assigned a crew to complete repairs inside of two circuit breaker tank enclosures. The permit(s) issued for entry into the confined space was not retained for at least one year following the completion of the job.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F06 I
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: Jobsite located at 158 Cronin Avenue, Forestville, Connecticut: On, or about, May 29, 2015, a tag along tanker body #96545 that was used to store used dielectric oil that had been drained from the Phase B tank of circuit breaker 12A-2T-2 was not labeled, tagged or marked to indicate the identity of the contents.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: Jobsite located at 158 Cronin Avenue, Forestville, Connecticut: On, or about, May 29, 2015, a tag-along tanker body #96545 that was used to store used dielectric oil that had been drained from the Phase B tank of circuit breaker 12A-2T-2 was not labeled, tagged or marked to indicate the appropriate hazard warning(s).
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at The Connecticut Light and Power Company
View The Connecticut Light and Power Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 221122)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340665413.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.