PHILADELPHIA, PA —
OSHA Inspection: MELROSE ENTERPRISES, LTD.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MELROSE ENTERPRISES, LTD. in 8TH AND ARCH STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 340667898.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MELROSE ENTERPRISES, LTD.
- Site address
- 8TH AND ARCH STREET
- City
- PHILADELPHIA
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 19106
- Mailing
- 130 DICKERSON ROAD, NORTH WALES, PA 19454
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238110
- Employees
- 60
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.52 D01
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
8110
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.52(d)(1): In all cases where the sound levels exceeded the values shown in Table D-2 of 29 CFR 1926.52, a continuing, effective hearing conservation program was not administered: a) Melrose Enterprises, Ltd., 8th and Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA - The employer did not administer an effective hearing conservation program. Employees performing operations including, but not limited to, chipping and busting concrete, shot blasting and grinding, were exposed to sound levels which exceeded the permissible exposure limit of 90 dBA as an 8-hour Time weighted average. The exposures measured is equivalent to an 8-hour TWA of 94.89 dBA, 93.24 dBA and 92.26 dBA. Zero exposures was assumed for all unsampled time periods. Observed on or about 6/4/15.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1926.101 B
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8110
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.101(b): Ear protective devices inserted in the ear were not fitted or determined individually by competent persons: a) Melrose Enterprises, Ltd. 8th and Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA- The employer provided employees with one type of ear plugs and these were not fitted or determined individually by competent persons. Employee performing operations including, but not limited to chipping and busting concrete, shot blasting and grinding concrete were exposed to sound levels which exceeded the permissible exposure limit of 90 dBA as an 8-hour Time weighted average. Observed on or about 6/4/15.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.55 A
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.55(a): Employee(s) were exposed to material(s) at concentrations above those specified in the Threshold Limit Values of Airborne Contaminants for 1970 of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists: a) Melrose Enterprises, Ltd, 8th and Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA- Employee exposure to silica exceeded the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL). Employee exposure monitoring conducted on June 4, 2015 showed that an employee operating the cement mixer, including adding 50 pound bags of IPATOP HES Base Cement Mortar to the mixer, was exposed to silica at an 8-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA) of 341 mppcf, approximately 41 times the Permissible Exposure Limit of 8.3 mppcf as an 8-hour time weighted average. Sampling was conducted for 152 minutes and a zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled portion of the 8-hour shift. Observed on or about 6/4/15.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1926.55 B
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.55(b): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not implemented to reduce employee exposure: a) Melrose Enterprises, Ltd., 8th and Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA - Feasible engineering or administrative controls were not implemented to reduce employee exposure to silica during cement mixing. Employee exposure to silica exceeded the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL). Employee exposure monitoring conducted on June 4, 2015 showed that an employee operating the cement mixer was exposed to silica at an 8-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA) of 341 mppcf, approximately 41 times the Permissible Exposure Limit of 8.3 mppcf as an 8-hour time weighted average. Sampling was conducted for 152 minutes and a zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled portion of the 8-hour shift. Observed on or about 6/4/15.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.51 F
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.51(f): Adequate washing facilities were not provided for employees engaged in the application of paints, coating, herbicides, or insecticides, or in other operations where contaminants might have been harmful to the employees: a) Melrose Enterprises, Ltd., 8th and Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA - The employer did ensure that adequate washing facilities, including clean water, non-alkaline soap and clean towels were provided for employees working with Portland Cement, contained in IPATOP HES Base Cement Mortar, exposing employees to skin hazards. Observed on or about 6/4/15.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use as referenced in 1926.103: a) Melrose Enterprises, Ltd., 8th and Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA - The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use. Employees were required to wear respirators such as, but not limited to Moldex 2300 series filtering facepiece respirators; 3M 6000 series half-mask and full facepiece air purifying respirators, and blasting helmets when they performed activities such as mixing cement; chipping and busting concrete; shot blasting; sweeping and other activities. Observed on or about 6/4/15.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1926.95 A
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Personal protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided, used, or maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition it was necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation, or physical contact: a) Melrose Enterprises, Ltd., 8th and Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA - The employer did not ensure that employees wore gloves and long sleeve shirts for protection from exposure to Portland Cement, when employees were adding and mixing cement using IPATOP HES Base Cement Mortar which contains 10 to 25% Portland Cement. Observed on or about 6/4/15.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.134 D01 I
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i): Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability as referenced in so CFR 1926.103: a) Melrose Enterprises, Ltd., 8th and Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA- The employee did not select and ensure the appropriate respirator, based on the maximum use concentration, was worn by an employee exposed to respirable silica in excess of the Permissible Exposure Limit. Employee exposure monitoring conducted on June 4, 2015 showed that an employee wearing a half-mask air purifying respirator with a maximum use concentration of 83 mppcf, while operating the cement mixer was exposed to silica at an 8-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA) of 341 mppcf, approximately 41 times the Permissible Exposure Limit of 8.3 mppcf as an 8-hour time weighted average. Observed on or about 6/4/15.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form as referenced in 29 CFR 1926.103: (a) Melrose Enterprises, Ltd. 8th and Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA - The employer did not identify and evaluate employees` exposure to respirable silica including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures while operating the cement mixer, including adding 50 pound bags of IPATOP HES Base Cement Mortar to the mixer. Employee exposure monitoring conducted on June 4, 2015 showed that an employee operating the cement mixer was exposed to silica at an 8-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA) of 341 mppcf, approximately 41 times the Permissible Exposure Limit of 8.3 mppcf as an 8-hour time weighted average. Observed on or about 6/4/15.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Melrose Enterprises, LTD.
View Melrose Enterprises, LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238110)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340667898.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.