FORT WORTH, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ in 3001 AMADOR DR., FORT WORTH, TX 76177 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340789445.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ
- Site address
- 3001 AMADOR DR.
- City
- FORT WORTH
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76177
- Mailing
- 3613 WOODBURY RD, BALCH SPRINGS, TX 75180
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck by, fall, and caught between hazards associated with the installation of prefabricated roof trusses that were not adequately braced. On or about July 18, 2015, employees were installing prefabricated roof trusses that were not adequately braced or supported exposing the employees to struck by, fall, and caught between hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $1400
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 19, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury. On or about July 18, 2015, the employer failed to instruct each employee in hazard recognition exposing employees to struck by, fall, and caught between hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $1400
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous. On or about July 18, 2015, employees used an extension cord that was missing the grounding pin and plugged in to a generator that powered hand tools exposing the employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $1000
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used. On or about July 18, 2015, employees used an extension cord that was damaged with the internal wires sticking out of the protective sheathing exposing the employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $1000
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.502 D21
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service. On or about July 18, 2015, employees were working at elevated heights using damaged personal fall arrest systems exposing the employees to fall hazards of approximately 14 feet.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $1000
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $28,000 · Current $14,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. On or about July 18, 2015, employees were working at elevated heights without fall protection exposing the employees to unprotected fall hazards of approximately 14 feet to the concrete slab below.
Recent events (3)
- — R (W) $14000
- — C (W) $28000
- — Z (W) $28000
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report an in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours. The employer failed to report to OSHA a work-related hospitalization of four employees prior to the elapse of the 24 hour reporting period of the incident.
Recent events (3)
- — R (O) $2500
- — C (O) $5000
- — Z (O) $5000
More inspections at Jose Luis Hernandez
View Jose Luis Hernandez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340789445.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.