Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J & J SNACK FOODS CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of J & J SNACK FOODS CORPORATION in 720 METROPOLITAN PKWY., ATLANTA, GA 30310 (NAICS 311412). OSHA activity number 340996354.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J & J Snack Foods Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J & J Snack Foods Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
720 METROPOLITAN PKWY.
City
ATLANTA
State
GA
ZIP
30310
Mailing
720 METROPOLITAN PKWY., ATLANTA, GA 30310
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311412
Employees
176
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 A03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $2,550 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(3)(i): Hinged floor openings were not equipped with standard railings or thereto so as to leave only one exposed side:  (a) On the second level of spiral #3, the hatch cover was not equipped with standard railings on three sides, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately thirteen (13) feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2550
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.147 C04 II B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $2,550 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy:  (a) Throughout the production area, adequate equipment specific procedures for shutting down, isolating, and securing energy sources were not developed and utilized when sanitizing, servicing and maintaining equipment such as, but not limited to, mixers and spirals, exposing the employees to electrical and amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2550
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  (a) Throughout the production area, the employer did not conduct periodic inspections of energy control procedures to ensure that adequate procedures were being utilized for sanitizing, maintenance and servicing of equipment such as, but not limited to, mixers and spirals, exposing the employees to electrical and amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $2,550 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  (a) In the biscuit area, emergency eyewash stations were not available in the immediate area in the Yeast Room and Moline line. Employees handling corrosive products such as FiSan 500 and Apex Chlorfoam 14 did not have immediate access to drenching equipment, exposing the employees to chemical burns.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2550
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.303 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $2,550 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(1): Each disconnecting means required by Subpart S of Part 1910 for motors and appliances was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:  (a) On the west wall in the biscuit area, electrical panels and disconnect switches were not marked to indicate their purpose, exposing the employees to an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2550
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.305 E01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(e)(1): Cabinets, cutout boxes, fittings, boxes, and panelboard enclosures in wet locations were not weatherproof:  (a) In the biscuit area, electrical panels located in a wash down area were not suitable for wet locations. The panels did not have water proof enclosures, exposing the employees to an electrical hazard.   (b) In the cookie line, a 480 volt distribution panel was not suitable for wet locations. The distribution panel did not have a water proof enclosure, exposing the employees to an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2016
Abate by
May 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication training did not include an explanation of the Global Harmonization System (GHS) with respect to the labeling, pictograms, and safety data sheets, including the order of information and how employees could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  (a) Throughout the facility, the employer did not provide training to employees on the new hazard communication standard Globally Harmonized System (GHS) as a result, employees were not familiar with the new hazard communication standard. Employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals in the workplace, such as but limited to, chlorinated detergents, acid cleaners, disinfectants, acid-based sanitizers and general purpose detergents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View J & J Snack Foods Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340996354.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.