CARLSTADT, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: NED STEVENS GUTTER CLEANING AND GENERAL CONTRACTING INC
Special Programs inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a special Programs safety inspection of NED STEVENS GUTTER CLEANING AND GENERAL CONTRACTING INC in 728 9TH STREET, CARLSTADT, NJ 07072 (NAICS 561790). OSHA activity number 340997725.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Site address
- 728 9TH STREET
- City
- CARLSTADT
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07072
- Mailing
- 11 DANIEL ROAD EAST, FAIRFIELD, NJ 07004
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Special Programs (K)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561790
- Employees
- 350
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a) Building Exterior: Two employees working without the use of eye protection while engaged in roof cleaning activities with chemical solutions, on or about 10/19/2015.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $7000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,400 · Current $4,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Facility: The employer did not establish or implement a written respiratory program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(I)-(ix) with worksite specific procedures for required respirator use. An employee was required to wear a tight-fitting half face respirator when performing chemical container changes in the tunnel washing area, on or about 10/19/2015. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $4400
- — C (S) $4400
- — Z (S) $4400
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Building Exterior Roof: Employees are required to use half mask respirators while spraying a chemical solution to clean off a roof. A medical evaluation was not provided, on or about 10/19/215.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,400 · Current $4,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein [HCS 1994]: Or in the alternative: 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled, tagged or marked with the Product identifier, words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals [HCS 2012]: a) Company Truck: Two large containers in the trunk of the company work vehicle did not have labels to identify the hazardous chemical solutions used for spraying down a roof, on or about 10/19/2015.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $4400
- — C (S) $4400
- — Z (S) $4400
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $15,400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees due to a fall from a roof. a) Building Exterior/Roof Level: The employer does not ensure that personal protective equipment was used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: The employer did not ensure that a personal fall arrest system was in use to prevent an employee standing on the sloped roof spraying a chemical solution from falling approximately 18 feet, on or about 10/19/2015. Ned Stevens Gutter Cleaning and General Contracting, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 951897, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 2/05/2015, with respect to a workplace located at 14 Grecian Street, Parsippany, NJ 07054.
Recent events (3)
- — F (R) $0
- — C (R) $15400
- — Z (R) $15400
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: a) Building Exterior/Roof Level: The employer does not ensure that personal protective equipment was used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: The employer did not ensure that a personal fall arrest system was in use to prevent an employee standing on the sloped roof spraying a chemical solution from falling approximately 18 feet, on or about 10/19/2015. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 1903.19(d) Ned Stevens Gutter Cleaning and General Contracting, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.132(a) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 942559, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 2/05/2015, with respect to a workplace located at 131 Longview Ave, Leonia, NJ 07605.
Recent events (3)
- — F (R) $0
- — C (R) $0
- — Z (R) $0
More inspections at NED Stevens Gutter Cleaning and General Contracting INC
View NED Stevens Gutter Cleaning and General Contracting INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561790)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340997725.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.