ROCKMART, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: TIP TOP POULTRY, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TIP TOP POULTRY, INC. in 479 NATHAN DEAN PKWY., ROCKMART, GA 30153 (NAICS 311615). OSHA activity number 341348746.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TIP TOP POULTRY, INC.
- Site address
- 479 NATHAN DEAN PKWY.
- City
- ROCKMART
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30153
- Mailing
- 327 WALLACE ROAD, MARIETTA, GA 30062
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311615
- Employees
- 700
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
17 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,475 · Current $1,807 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): Floors(s) of workroom(s) were not maintained, so far as possible, in a dry condition. a. Engine Room 1 - The employer exposed employees to trip hazards in that the floor was not maintained. A roof leak allowed water to pool on the floor, exposing employees to slip hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1806.75
- · Z (S) $2475
1910.27 B01 II
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.27(b)(1)(ii): 29 CFR 1910.27(b)(1)(ii): The distance between rungs, cleats, or steps of fixed ladders exceeded 12 inches: a. Roll Cook Room - The employees using the fixed ladder to enter and exit the roll cooker for sanitation purposes were not provided with a ladder step distance of 12 inches.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $3300
1910.36 D01
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,475 · Current $1,807 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1): Employees must be able to open an exit route door from the inside at all time without keys, tools or special knowledge. a. Engine room #1 - The west side exit route door (gate), required special knowledge, in that, a box needed to be opened and a button pressed in order to exit the area to the emergency assembly area.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1806.75
- · Z (S) $2475
1910.119 F01 III D
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,125 · Current $3,011 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iii)(D): The employer's written operating procedures covering operating limits did not address quality control for raw materials and control of hazardous chemical inventory levels: a. Engine Room #1 - The employer did not develop an operating procedure for inbounding (receiving) ammonia that addressed at a minimum the verification of the quality of ammonia received and inventory levels.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3011.25
- · Z (S) $4125
1910.119 I01
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,125 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(i)(1): The employer did not perform a pre-startup safety review for new facilities and for modified facilities when the modification was significant enough to require a change in the process safety information. a. Engine Room #1 - The employer did not conduct a pre-startup safety review for the modified ammonia system when two AccuAir units where added that increased the ammonia quantity in the system to over 10,000-lbs to confirm that start-up check and tests were conducted and documented, equipment was properly identified and labeled, and all maintenance testing and inspection procedures were in place and adequate.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $4125
1910.119 J04 II
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii): Inspection and testing procedures did not follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices: a. Engine Room #1 - The employer failed to document inspection and testing procedures for items such as but not limited to safety critical cutouts as specified in International Institute of Ammonia Refrigeration (IIAR) Bulletin 110 (3/93).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.119 L01
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,125 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(1): The employer did not implement procedures to manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures, and changes to facilities that affect a covered process: a. Engine Room #1 - A management of change was not implemented for when the 75 psid relief valves were added to Evaporative Condenser (EC) #4.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $4125
1910.178 M05 I
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,125 · Current $3,011 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(5)(i): When a powered industrial truck is left unattended, load engaging means shall be fully lowered, controls shall be neutralized, power shall be shut off, and brakes set. Wheels shall be blocked if the truck is parked on an incline: a. Yard - The Yard truck, number 501 and 510, wheels were not choked on an incline when parked or not attended by the drivers.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3011.25
- · Z (S) $4125
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): 29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe, the truck shall be taken out of service until it has been restored to safe operating condition. a. Freezer area - The employer allowed employees to operate a Crown forklift, SC4000 Series (#34), that was not removed from service when it was found with non-functional tail lights and a bent backrest.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,475 · Current $1,807 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a. Reject Conveyor X-3 - The employer exposed employees to caught-in hazards when they failed to cover or guard an in-running nip point on the reject conveyor.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1806.75
- · Z (S) $2475
1910.219 C02 I
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed parts of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform, excepting runways used exclusively for oiling, or running adjustments, shall be protected by a stationary casing enclosing shafting completely or by a trough enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting as location requires. a. Debone Line 4 - The employer exposed employees to caught-in hazards by not covering or guarding the horizontal shaft between the motor and conveyor.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.219 C04 I
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft: a. Debone Line 4 - The employer exposed employees to entanglement/caught-in hazards in that the projecting shaft end of the Debone Line did not present a smooth edge nor was it covered or guarded.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.333 A
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,125 · Current $3,011 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(a): Safety-related work practices shall be employed to prevent electric shock or other injuries resulting from either direct or indirect electrical contacts, when work is performed near or on equipment or circuits which are or may be energized. The specific safety-related work practices shall be consistent with the nature and extent of the associated electrical hazards. a. Worksite - The employer exposed employees to electrical hazards in that safety-related work practices were not employed to prevent electric shock or other injuries from either direct or indirect electrical contacts as required. The company had not initiated an arc flash study that would address electrical safety.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3011.25
- · Z (S) $4125
1910.333 A02
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(a)(2): Where exposed live parts were not deenergized, other safety related work practices were not used to protect employees who could be exposed to the electrical hazards involved: a. Worksite - The employer exposed employees to electrical hazards in that safety-related work practices were not used when working on energized equipment and conductors. An electrical safety work plan was not implemented or used when workers were servicing electrical cabinets and troubleshooting equipment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not using electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed: a. Worksite - The employer exposed employees working on either energized or potentially energized equipment to electrical hazards in that appropriate personal protective equipment for working on various magnitudes of energy was not provided.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.36 G02
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(2): Exit access(es) were not at least 28 inches (71.1 cm) wide at all points. a. Debone Packout Route - The employer exposed employees to entrapment hazards in that a route of exit for the Debone Packout area was approximately 26 inches wide.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a. Yard - The employer exposed employees to struck-by and collision hazards by not ensuring that yard truck operators were either certified with a valid CDL license or employer provided training.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at TIP TOP Poultry, INC.
View TIP TOP Poultry, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311615)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341348746.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.