JERSEY CITY, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: CAJAMARCA CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CAJAMARCA CONSTRUCTION CORP. in 259 HALLADAY STREET, JERSEY CITY, NJ 07304 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341410751.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CAJAMARCA CONSTRUCTION CORP.
- Site address
- 259 HALLADAY STREET
- City
- JERSEY CITY
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07304
- Mailing
- 36 PROSPECT STREET APT# 2F, ELIZABETH, NJ 07201
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,080 · Current $3,080
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) 259 Halladay Street, Jersey City, NJ The employer had not ensured that employees were given eye protection as they were exposed to penetrating eye trauma from nails while using the Bostitch pneumatic nailers. Violation occurred on or about 04/18/2016
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3080
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Apr 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $11,000 · Current $11,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: a) 259 Halladay Street, Jersey City, NJ The employer had not ensured that his employees were protected from head injury from falling roofing materials, tools and equipment as they were not wearing hardhats. Violation occurred on or about 04/18/2016 . The Cajamarca Construction Corp. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.100(a) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1003913, citation number 2, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 01/20/2015, with respect to a workplace located at 250 Vivien Ct., Paramus, NJ..
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $11000
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $6,160 · Current $6,160
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) 259 Halladay Street, Jersey City, NJ. The employer had not ensured that his employees were protected from falls of 28 feet to the ground below while accessing and disembarking from the 36' extension ladder as the ladder's side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the roof's edge. Violation occurred on or about 04/18/2016. The Cajamarca Construction Corp. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1141075, citation number 1, item number 4 and was affirmed as a final order on 05/28/2013, with respect to a workplace located at 132 Carmita Avenue, East Rutherford, NJ.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $6160
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $30,800 · Current $30,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor was the employee provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a) 259 Halladay Street, Jersey City, NJ. The employer had not ensured that his employees were protected from falls of 28 feet from the 5 in 12 sloped roof to the ground below when working on applying the roof shingles at this new home construction project. Violation occurred on or about 04/18/2016.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (W) $30800
More inspections at Cajamarca Construction Corp.
View Cajamarca Construction Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341410751.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.