Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DUNKIRK SPECIALTY STEEL LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DUNKIRK SPECIALTY STEEL LLC in 830 BRIGHAM ROAD, DUNKIRK, NY 14048 (NAICS 331111). OSHA activity number 341627677.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Dunkirk Specialty Steel LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dunkirk Specialty Steel LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
830 BRIGHAM ROAD
City
DUNKIRK
State
NY
ZIP
14048
Mailing
830 BRIGHAM ROAD, DUNKIRK, NY 14048
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331111
Employees
245
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2016
Abate by
Nov 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,126 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition:    a) On or about 09/15/16 throughout the plant; employees were exposed to burn hazards while performing the following tasks, such as but not limited to, voltage testing, working in proximity to energized electrical equipment, opening disconnects and other energized electrical circuits, when their 12 cal and 43 cal arc/flame resistant coveralls were not inspected on a regular basis to determine whether the clothing was properly washed, in need of repair or replacement.      ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $7126

1910.137 C02 VIII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,126 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.137(c)(2)(viii): Electrical protective equipment was not subjected to periodic electrical tests. Test voltages and/or the maximum intervals between tests were not conducted in accordance with Table I-5 and Table I-6.    a) On or about 07/20/16 throughout the plant; employees wore Class 2 Salisbury brand electrical protective gloves, which were lasted tested in June 2015 and December 2015, to test for the presence of electricity panels, disconnects, conductors.      NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQURIED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $7126

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $12,471 · Current $10,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from the implement hazard(s) created by steel rods entering and being ejected from the Medart machines:     a) On or about 06/17/16 in the Medart department; employees operated the #1 Medart and were exposed to an impalement hazard when the area adjacent to the exit chute was not guard allowing them to be in proximity to where the steel rods discharged onto the inspection table.      b) On or about 07/20/16 in the Medart department; employees operated the #1 Medart and were exposed to an impalement hazard when the area adjacent to the west side of the feed end was not guarded allowing access to where steel rods entered the machine.      c) On or about 07/20/16 in the Medart department; employees operated the #2B Medart and were exposed to an impalement hazard when the exit chute was not guarded allowing them to be in proximity to where steel rods were discharged onto the inspection table.      d) On or about 07/20/16 in the Medart department; employees operated the #5 Medart and were exposed to an impalement hazard when the guard on the east side of the feed end was not secured and easily removable allowing access to the area where steel rods enter the machine.      e) On or about 07/20/16 in the Medart department; employees operated the #2A Medart and were exposed to an impalement hazard when the exit chute was not guarded allowing them to be in proximity to where the steel rods were discharged onto the inspection table.      f) On or about 07/20/16 in the Medart department; employees operated the #0 Medart and were exposed to an impalement hazard when the exit chute was not guarded allowing them to be in proximity to where the steel rods were discharged onto the inspection table.     NO ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $10000
  • — Z (S) $12471

1904.39 A02

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer failed to report the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees as a result of a work-related incident, within (24) twenty-four hours.  a) On or about 06/17/16 in the Medart area; an employee was involved in a work-related incident which resulted in hospital admission on 06/18/16 and OSHA was notified of the event on 07/19/16.    NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $5000

View Dunkirk Specialty Steel LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341627677.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.