Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CONN-SELMER, INC

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of CONN-SELMER, INC in 34199 CURTIS BLVD, EASTLAKE, OH 44095 (NAICS 339992). OSHA activity number 341723401.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Conn-Selmer, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Conn-Selmer, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CONN-SELMER, INC
Site address
34199 CURTIS BLVD
City
EASTLAKE
State
OH
ZIP
44095
Mailing
34199 CURTIS BLVD, EASTLAKE, OH 44095
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
339992
Employees
200
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.38 C04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 280 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2016
Abate by
Dec 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,345 · Current $5,345
29 CFR 1910.38(c)(4): The emergency action plan did not include procedures to account for all employees after evacuation:  On or about August 24, 2016, the employers emergency action plan did not include specific procedures outlining how employees will be accounted for following an evacuation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5345
  • — Z (S) $5345

1910.38 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 280 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2016
Abate by
Dec 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(f)(1): The employer did not train employees on the emergency action plan when it was developed or when the employee was assigned initially to a job:  On or about August 24, 2016, the emergency action plan had not been reviewed with employees upon initial hire to the facility. Employees were not familiar with the designated meeting location.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,345 · Current $5,345
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  On or before August 24, 2016, voluntary use of full face air purifying respirators was permitted for employees in the wastewater treatment area of the facility. The information contained in Appendix D was not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5345
  • — Z (S) $5345

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2016
Abate by
Dec 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:  On or before August 24, 2016, employees in the wastewater treatment area were permitted to voluntarily use full face air purifying respirators but were not provided medical evaluations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2016
Abate by
Dec 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about August 31, 2016, fit tests had not been administered to employees required to wear full face air purifying respirators when manually adding any chemicals to the wastewater treatment system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K05

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2016
Abate by
Dec 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(5): Respiratory protection retraining was not conducted annually:  On or about August 24, 2016, employees were required to wear air purifying respirators during polishing operations and had not received respiratory protection training on an annual basis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2016
Abate by
Dec 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $8,908 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:    On or about August 24, 2016, labels on chemicals in the wastewater treatment area of the facility were not supplemented with pictograms, pictures, or symbols to clearly communicate specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the chemicals to employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $8908

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2016
Abate by
Dec 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:   On or about August 24, 2016, wastewater treatment employees worked with or around chemicals including but not limited to sodium metabisulfite, sulfuric acid, caustic soda, sodium hypochlorite, and silver cyanide salts. Employees had not received training on the specific hazards of these chemicals along with the measures employees can take to protect themselves from these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 280 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2016
Abate by
Dec 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used:  On or about August 24, 2016, the employer had not developed, implemented, and trained employees on adequate procedures for the addition of chemicals to the wastewater treatment system in that there was no established method for employees to document and communicate any additions. Employees were exposed to chemical incompatibilities and the generation of toxic gases as a result of chemicals being inadvertently added to the system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Conn-Selmer, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341723401.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.