Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SPINWELD, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SPINWELD, INC. in W227 N546 WESTMOUND DRIVE, WAUKESHA, WI 53186 (NAICS 332912). OSHA activity number 341945491.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Spinweld, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Spinweld, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SPINWELD, INC.
Site address
W227 N546 WESTMOUND DRIVE
City
WAUKESHA
State
WI
ZIP
53186
Mailing
W227 N546 WESTMOUND ROAD, WAUKESHA, WI 53186
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332912
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 3, 2017
Abate by
Apr 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $2,898 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    a)  The company had not developed or implemented machine specific energy control procedures for equipment that was being serviced or repaired such as the friction welder W-1-250A.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2897.6
  • — Z (S) $3622

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 3, 2017
Abate by
Apr 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct an annual or more frequent inspection of the energy control procedure to ensure that the procedure and requirements of this standard were followed:    a)  The company had not performed an annual inspection of the energy control program and procedures for at least the last two years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3622

1910.178 M05 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(5)(iii): Powered industrial truck(s), with the operator dismounted and within 25 feet of the truck still in his view, did not have the forks lowered fully:    a)  The Toyota Forklift Model 5FGC25 Serial number 5FGC25-12326 was observed to have the forks raised approximately two feet with the load.  This was being used as a work platform for the lathe operator in the south east corner of the production area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 3, 2017
Abate by
Jun 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $4,056 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a)  The Caterpillar W-1-250A friction weld unit at work center WC 117 Serial # unknown was not provided with adequate guarding to protect employees from injury from rotating parts during operation of the unit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4056
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 3, 2017
Abate by
Jun 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    a)  The Caterpillar W-1-250A friction weld unit at work center WC 117 Serial # unknown was not provided with adequate guarding to protect employees from injury at the point of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 C01 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 3, 2017
Abate by
Apr 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $2,898 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually:    a)  The exposure control plan has not been reviewed or updated with documentation since written more than two years ago.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2897.6
  • — Z (S) $3622

1910.1030 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 3, 2017
Abate by
Apr 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer shall train each employee with occupational exposure in accordance with the requirements of this section. Such training must be provided at no cost to the employee and during working hours. The employer shall institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program.    a)  A designated employee responding to an employee who experienced a crushing/amputation injury with exposure to blood and body fluids had not been trained on the blood borne pathogens exposure control program for at least two years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Mar 3, 2017
Abate by
May 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,738 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a)  The company had not updated the written hazard communication program to include the information regarding GHS (Global  Harmonization), safety data sheets and pictograms used for labeling.  Chemicals used include oils, metal cooling fluids, LP gas and solvents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1738.4
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Mar 3, 2017
Abate by
Apr 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): Employee training did not include the details of the hazardous communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of labels received on shipped containers and the work place labeling system used by their employer, and the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how the employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  a)  The company had not updated the written hazard communication program to provide training to employees on the program and procedures for safety data sheets, GHS labeling and how to obtain additional information on the (GHS) global harmonization system regarding chemicals used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Spinweld, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341945491.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.