Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AUGERS UNLIMITED, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AUGERS UNLIMITED, INC. in 735 FOX CHASE RD #114, COATESVILLE, PA 19320 (NAICS 333518). OSHA activity number 342311313.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Augers Unlimited, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Augers Unlimited, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
735 FOX CHASE RD #114
City
COATESVILLE
State
PA
ZIP
19320
Mailing
735 FOX CHASE RD #114, COATESVILLE, PA 19320
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333518
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2017
Abate by
Jul 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,346 · Current $2,825 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a) Jobsite - The employer did not ensure that all metalworking lathes were properly guarded around the chuck exposing employees to struck-by hazards.  Observed on or about 17 FEB 2017.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2824.9
  • — Z (S) $4346

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,078 · Current $2,001 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:    a) Jobsite - The employer did not ensure that the work rest on all mounted bench grinders were less than one-eighth of an inch away from the grinding wheel exposing employees to struck-by hazards from a shattered grinding wheel.  Observed on or about 17 FEB 2017.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000.7
  • — Z (S) $3078

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,078 · Current $2,001 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:    a) Jobsite - The employer did not ensure that the tongue guard was properly set up to ensure that the tongue guard on all bench grinders were set to a maximum opening of one fourth inch exposing employees to struck by hazards in the case of a shattered wheel.  Observed on or about 17 FEB 2017.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000.7
  • — Z (S) $3078

1910.215 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2017
Abate by
Jul 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(d)(1): Wheel(s) on grinding machine(s) were not sounded (ring test) and inspected for damage before mounting:  a) Jobsite - The employer did not ensure that employees engaged in replacing the abrasive wheel were performing ring tests to ensure the integrity of the abrasive wheels before use. Observed on or about 17 FEB 2017.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2017
Abate by
Jul 5, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,346 · Current $2,825 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting:    a) Jobsite - The employer did not ensure that employees working around the lathes were protected from rotating horizontal shafts that were rotating approximately five (5) feet from the floor. Observed on or about 17 FEB 2017.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2824.9
  • — Z (S) $4346

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2017
Abate by
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,346 · Current $2,825 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:    a) Jobsite - The employer directed employees to use flexible cords and other types of temporary wiring instead of fixed wiring of a structure exposing the employees to electrical and fire hazards.  Observed on or about 17 FEB 2017.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2824.9
  • — Z (S) $4346

View Augers Unlimited, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342311313.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.