Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: QUALITY RESTORATION & ROOFING INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of QUALITY RESTORATION & ROOFING INC. in 10645 HALLIGAN WAY, MOKENA, IL 60448 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342382561.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Quality Restoration & Roofing INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Quality Restoration & Roofing INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10645 HALLIGAN WAY
City
MOKENA
State
IL
ZIP
60448
Mailing
8249 NATOMA, BURBANK, IL 60459
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2018
Abate by
Feb 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $311 · Current $311
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer did not certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  a. On or about December 26, 2017 - the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected:  Citation Number                Item Number            Abatement Date 01                                    001a                        08/17/2017 01                                    002                          08/17/2017  01                                    003a                        08/17/2017 01                                    003b                        08/17/2017 02                                    002                          08/17/2017
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $311

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2017
Abate by
Aug 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,793 · Current $1,793
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a.  On or about June 8, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not maintain an accident prevention program to comply with the regulations of this part which included, but were not limited to employee protection when exposed to falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1793

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2017
Abate by
Aug 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,793 · Current $1,793
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a.  On or about June 8, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees working in a on the ground while roofing operations were being conducted above were not wearing hard hats to protect against falling materials and debris.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1793

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2017
Abate by
Aug 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,390 · Current $2,390
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed.   a.  On or about June 8, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the portable ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least three (3') feet above the upper landing surface, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2390

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2017
Abate by
Aug 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level  a.  On or about June 8, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to falls hazards when the bottom of the ladder on the garage was not secured to prevent from displacement, thereby exposing the employees to hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,366 · Current $8,366
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501  a.  On or about June 8, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, eighteen (18) feet six (6) inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.  Quality Restoration and Roofing Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health Standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1087655, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on October 22, 2015, with respect to a workplace located at 1114-1120 Coneflower, Minooka, IL.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $8366

1926.503 A01

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2017
Abate by
Aug 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,585 · Current $3,585
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a.  On or about June 8, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees conducting roofing operations were not provided training on how to minimize fall protection hazards, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls.  Quality Restoration & Roofing Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health Standard 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1087655, citation number 1, item number 3 and was affirmed as a final order on October 22, 2015, with respect to a workplace located at 1114-1120 Coneflower, Minooka, IL. 60447.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $3585

View Quality Restoration & Roofing INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342382561.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.