MILWAUKEE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: PERLICK CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PERLICK CORPORATION in 8300 WEST GOOD HOPE ROAD, MILWAUKEE, WI 53223 (NAICS 333415). OSHA activity number 344649074.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PERLICK CORPORATION
- Site address
- 8300 WEST GOOD HOPE ROAD
- City
- MILWAUKEE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53223
- Mailing
- 8300 WEST GOOD HOPE ROAD, MILWAUKEE, WI 53223
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333415
- Employees
- 197
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,426 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user (a) On, or about February 24, 2020, Grind and Polish employees that had been given a PAPR to use while preforming job tasks were not provided a medical evaluation to insure employee(s) were physically able to safely use a respirator, prior to using a respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000
- — Z (S) $4426
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2020
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $5,899 · Current $5,195 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) United States Electrical Tool Grinder / Polisher: On or about February 24, 2020, sufficient point of operation barrier guarding over the buffing / grinding wheel, and over the abrasive belt grinding head was not provided to protect operator and other employees working in the area from ingoing nip points, and rotating parts. (b) Hammond Machine Builders Grinder / Polisher: On or about February 24, 2020, sufficient point of operation barrier guarding over the buffing / grinding wheel, and over the abrasive belt grinding head was not provided to protect operator and other employees working in the area from ingoing nip points, and rotating parts. (c) Hammond Machine builders Grinder / Polisher: On or about June 11, 2020, sufficient point of operation barrier guarding over the buffing / grinding wheel, and over abrasive belt grinding head was not provided to protect operator and other employees working in the area from ingoing nip points, and rotating parts. (d) Devine Machine Builders Grinder / Polisher: On or about June 11, 2020, sufficient point of operation barrier guarding over the buffing / wire wheel, and over the abrasive grinding wheel was not provided to protect operator and other employees working in the area from ingoing nip points, and rotating parts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5195
- — Z (S) $5899
1910.219 C02 I
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2020
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting: (a) United States Electrical Tool Grinder / Polisher: On or about February 24, 2020, employees working at, and around the grinder / polisher were exposed to unguarded section(s) of shaft operating at up to 2,000 rotations per minute. This exposed employees to a caught on, and snagging hazard. (b) Hammond Machine Builders Grinder / Polisher: On or about February 24, 2020, employees working at, and around the grinder / polisher were exposed to unguarded section(s) of shaft operating at up to 2,400 rotations per minute. This exposed employees to a caught on, and snagging hazard. (c) Devine Machine Builders Grinder / Polisher: On or about June 11, 2020, employees working at, and around the grinder / polisher were exposed to unguarded section(s) of shaft operating at up to 2,400 rotations per minute. This exposed employees to a caught on, and snagging hazard. (d) Hammond Machine Builders Grinder / Polisher: On or about June 11, 2020, employees working at, and around the grinder / polisher were exposed to unguarded section(s) of shaft operating at up to 2,400 rotations per minute. This exposed employees to a caught on, and snagging hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.219 C04 I
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2020
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Projecting shaft ends did not present a smooth edge and end, and projected more than one-half the diameter of the shaft without being guarded by nonrotating caps or safety sleeves: (a) Devine Machine Grinder / Polisher: On or about June 11, 2020, an exposed two (2) Inch diameter rotating shaft end located approximately 32 inches above the floor projected approximately two (2) inches, and was not guarded. This exposed employees to cuts, lacerations, and contusions. (b) Hammond Machine Tool Company Grinder / Polisher: On or about June 11, 2020, an exposed two (2) Inch diameter rotating shaft end located approximately 32 inches above the floor projected approximately two (2) inches, and was not guarded. This exposed employees to cuts, lacerations, and contusions.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 G01 I B
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(B): For electric equipment operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, and likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized, the width of the working space in front of electrical equipment was less than the width of the equipment or 762 mm (30 inches), whichever was greater : (a) On or about June 11, 2020, in the south grind and polish area, the working space around, and in front of the two (2) electrical disconnect switch boxes were blocked from access by ductwork, boxes, worktables, and the grind and polish machine. This condition did not allow sufficient entrance, and access to the two 480 volt electrical panels/disconnects.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Perlick Corporation
View Perlick Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333415)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344649074.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.