OSHA Inspection: ALFREDO SANCHEZ

Issued

Mar 19, 2021

Abate by

Mar 31, 2021

Penalty

Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2):The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.  a. On or about January 21, 2021, the employer failed to instruct each employee in the avoidance of unsafe conditions while performing framing activities.

Issued

Mar 19, 2021

Abate by

Mar 31, 2021

Penalty

Initial $8,192 · Current $8,192

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1):It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a. On or about January 21, 2021, the employer failed to instruct each employee in the avoidance of unsafe conditions while performing framing activities.  Alfredo Sanchez was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard (name previously cited standard), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1496326, citation number 1, item number 1  and was affirmed as a final order on November 10, 2020, with respect to a workplace located at Lot 127 Preservation Way, Pickerington, Ohio 43147.

Issued

Mar 19, 2021

Abate by

Mar 31, 2021

Penalty

Initial $8,192 · Current $8,192

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or about January 21, 2021, employees were performing framing work on a two story residential home without the use of fall protection, the employee was working on the roof at elevated heights of over 9 feet, thereby exposing the employees to a fall hazard.  Alfredo Sanchez was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard 1926.501(b)(13) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1496326, citation number 1, item number 3 and was affirmed as a final order on November 10, 2020, with respect to a workplace located at Lot 127 Preservation Way, Pickerington, Ohio 43147.