Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ANTONIO MARTINEZ

Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of ANTONIO MARTINEZ in 23703 VERBENA MEADOW DRIVE, KATY, TX 77493 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 345699755.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Antonio Martinez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Antonio Martinez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ANTONIO MARTINEZ
Site address
23703 VERBENA MEADOW DRIVE
City
KATY
State
TX
ZIP
77493
Mailing
2915 NAPOLEONIC COURT, HOUSTON, TX 77014
Inspection type
Programmed Related (J)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2022
Penalty
Initial $2,486 · Current $1,492 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  On or about December 22, 2021, at a residential construction site in Katy, TX employees were exposed to falling object hazards while doing masonry work on a house without the use of hard hats.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1491.6
  • — Z (S) $2486

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2022
Penalty
Initial $2,486 · Current $1,492 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  On or about December 22, 2021, at a residential construction site in Katy, TX, employees were exposed to struck by hazards while working with and near a miter saw used for cutting bricks without eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1491.6
  • — Z (S) $2486

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $1,865 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(b)(1)(i):Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary.  On or about December 22, 2021, at a residential construction site in Katy, TX, employees were working on multi tiered scaffolding that had missing planking.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1864.8
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(c)(2):Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  On or about December 22, 2021, at a residential construction site in Katy, TX, employees were working more than 6 feet on scaffolding that had missing and inadequate scaffold base plates and mud sills.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1):Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  On or about December 22, 2021, at a residential construction site in Katy, TX employees were  working on scaffolding that did not have top rails or the use of other fall protection systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 H02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $1,865 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(h)(2)(ii):A toe board was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below: Note:  This requirement does not apply to float (ship) scaffolds where an edging of 3/4 inch x 1 1/2 inch (2 x 4 cm) wood or equivalent was used in lieu of toe boards.  On or about December 22, 2021, at a residential construction site in Katy, TX employees were working on and near scaffolding without the use of toe boards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1864.8
  • — Z (S) $3108

View Antonio Martinez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345699755.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.