LITTLE ROCK, AR —
OSHA Inspection: SAGE V FOODS, LLC
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of SAGE V FOODS, LLC in 5901 SLOANE DRIVE, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 (NAICS 424490). OSHA activity number 345929061.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SAGE V FOODS, LLC
- Site address
- 5901 SLOANE DRIVE
- City
- LITTLE ROCK
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72206
- Mailing
- 5901 SLOANE DRIVE, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 424490
- Employees
- 268
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $14,502 · Current $14,502
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that caused or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm in the coil zones of Blast Freezer A when spraying off the coils inside Blast Freezer A?s coil zones: On April 30, 2022, at the beginning of his work shift, an employee went into a coil zone of Blast Freezer A. While the employer had a written safe-working procedures in place for the cleaning of coil zones in Blast Freezer A, which prohibited employees from entering the coil zone and required the use of an air wand, the existing safe work procedure did not physically restrain employee entry into the coil zones of Blast Freezer A.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $14502
- — Z (S) $14502
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Oct 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $14,502 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: On or about April 30, 2022, employees performed servicing and maintenance activities such as but not limited to inspecting and cleaning blast freezers. Written procedures were not utilized when employees entered the blast freezers to perform servicing and/or maintenance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $14502
1910.147 C04 II B
- Issued
- Oct 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $14,502 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy. Employees perform servicing and maintenance activities such as inspecting and cleaning equipment including, but not limited to blast freezers. Written procedures developed did not contain steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing the blast freezer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $14502
1910.147 C04 II D
- Issued
- Oct 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures: Employees perform servicing and maintenance activities such as inspecting and cleaning equipment including, but not limited to blast freezers. Written procedures developed did not contain steps for verifying the effectiveness of the energy control measures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 F03 I
- Issued
- Oct 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $14,502 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(i): A procedure was not utilized to afford the employees a level of protection equivalent to that provided by the implementation of a personal lockout or tagout device when servicing and/or maintenance was performed by a crew, craft, department or other group: Employees performing servicing and/or maintenance were not afforded a level of protection equivalent to applying a personal lockout device in that: (a) On or about April 30, 2022, employees performed servicing and/or maintenance such as but not limited to spraying off coils in the blast freezers. (b) On or about May 5, 2022, employees performed servicing and/or maintenance including but not limited to sanitation in blast freezers.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $14502
1904.40 A
- Issued
- Oct 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,279 · Current $2,279
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative the records within the four business hours. On or about May 6, 2022, the employer did not provide OSHA with the OSHA 301 forms as requested on May 5, 2022.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2279
- — Z (O) $2279
More inspections at Sage V Foods, LLC
View Sage V Foods, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424490)
More inspections in AR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345929061.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.