Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: R GARCIA LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of R GARCIA LLC in 652 CARLYLE AVE PIZZA HUT, BELLEVILLE, IL 62220 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346339534.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch R Garcia LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for R Garcia LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
R GARCIA LLC
Site address
652 CARLYLE AVE PIZZA HUT
City
BELLEVILLE
State
IL
ZIP
62220
Mailing
119 GLENWOOD DR., FENTON, MO 63026
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2023
Abate by
Jun 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $376 · Current $376
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1):Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  a)  For Citation 1, Item 1a, issued on 3/27/2023 with an abatement date of 4/28/2023, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation. b)  For Citation 1, Item 2, issued on 3/27/2023 with an abatement date of 4/28/2023, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation. c)  For Citation 1, Item 3c, issued on 3/27/2023 with an abatement date of 4/28/2023, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $376

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2023
Abate by
Jun 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $376 · Current $376
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1):The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  a)  For Citation 1, Item 1b, issued on 3/27/2023 with an abatement date of 4/28/2023, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. b)  For Citation 1, Item 3a, issued on 3/27/2023 with an abatement date of 4/28/2023, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. c)  For Citation 1, Item 3b, issued on 3/27/2023 with an abatement date of 4/28/2023, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $376

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2023
Abate by
Apr 28, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part:   On or about 11/08/2022, the employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs to protect employees from fall hazards & struck-by hazards during construction operations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2023
Abate by
Apr 28, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  On or about 11/08/2022, the employer did not maintain jobsite inspections that were performed by a person competent to ensure employees were not exposed to fall hazards and struck-by hazards during construction operations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2023
Abate by
Apr 28, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,679 · Current $2,679
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  On or about 11/08/2022, the employer did not ensure that eye protective equipment was used when employees were exposed to eye injury while using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2679

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2023
Abate by
Apr 28, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(10):Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system.  On or about 11/08/2022, the employer did not ensure appropriate fall protection was implemented for employees performing commercial roofing operations on a low-pitch roof that was less than 50 feet in width.  The employees were exposed to fall hazards up to approximately twelve (12) feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2023
Abate by
Apr 28, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not  independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee   On or about 11/08/2022, the employer did not ensure that anchor points were installed to support at least 5,000 pounds per employee.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D16 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2023
Abate by
Apr 28, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502 (d)(16)(ii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, did not limit the maximum arresting force on an employee to 1800 pounds (8kn) when used with a body harness:    On or about 11/08/2022, the employer did not ensure that employees were using deceleration devices as part of the fall arrest system.  The fall vertical lifeline was anchored to the roof in a way that defeated the deceleration device (Shock Pack) on the lifeline.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View R Garcia LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346339534.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.