BELLEVILLE, IL —
OSHA Inspection: R GARCIA LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of R GARCIA LLC in 652 CARLYLE AVE PIZZA HUT, BELLEVILLE, IL 62220 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346339534.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- R GARCIA LLC
- Site address
- 652 CARLYLE AVE PIZZA HUT
- City
- BELLEVILLE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62220
- Mailing
- 119 GLENWOOD DR., FENTON, MO 63026
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- May 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 26, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $376 · Current $376
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. a) For Citation 1, Item 1a, issued on 3/27/2023 with an abatement date of 4/28/2023, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation. b) For Citation 1, Item 2, issued on 3/27/2023 with an abatement date of 4/28/2023, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation. c) For Citation 1, Item 3c, issued on 3/27/2023 with an abatement date of 4/28/2023, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- May 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 26, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $376 · Current $376
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1):The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. a) For Citation 1, Item 1b, issued on 3/27/2023 with an abatement date of 4/28/2023, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. b) For Citation 1, Item 3a, issued on 3/27/2023 with an abatement date of 4/28/2023, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. c) For Citation 1, Item 3b, issued on 3/27/2023 with an abatement date of 4/28/2023, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Mar 27, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 28, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part: On or about 11/08/2022, the employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs to protect employees from fall hazards & struck-by hazards during construction operations.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Mar 27, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 28, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): On or about 11/08/2022, the employer did not maintain jobsite inspections that were performed by a person competent to ensure employees were not exposed to fall hazards and struck-by hazards during construction operations.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Mar 27, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 28, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $2,679
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: On or about 11/08/2022, the employer did not ensure that eye protective equipment was used when employees were exposed to eye injury while using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2679
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Mar 27, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 28, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10):Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system. On or about 11/08/2022, the employer did not ensure appropriate fall protection was implemented for employees performing commercial roofing operations on a low-pitch roof that was less than 50 feet in width. The employees were exposed to fall hazards up to approximately twelve (12) feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Mar 27, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 28, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee On or about 11/08/2022, the employer did not ensure that anchor points were installed to support at least 5,000 pounds per employee.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D16 II
- Issued
- Mar 27, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 28, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502 (d)(16)(ii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, did not limit the maximum arresting force on an employee to 1800 pounds (8kn) when used with a body harness: On or about 11/08/2022, the employer did not ensure that employees were using deceleration devices as part of the fall arrest system. The fall vertical lifeline was anchored to the roof in a way that defeated the deceleration device (Shock Pack) on the lifeline.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at R Garcia LLC
View R Garcia LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346339534.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.