Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION in 3000 KENNEDY DRIVE, BELOIT, WI 53511 (NAICS 311422). OSHA activity number 346463474.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hormel Foods Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hormel Foods Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3000 KENNEDY DRIVE
City
BELOIT
State
WI
ZIP
53511
Mailing
3000 KENNEDY DRIVE, BELOIT, WI 53511
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311422
Employees
405
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Apr 12, 2023
Abate by
Apr 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $15,625 · Current $10,938 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  a) On or about February 2, 2023 the employer did not ensure energy control procedures were utilized when an employee was reassembling a Graco Saniforce Drum Unloader after it had been disassembled for sanitation purposes.  b) On or about February 2, 2023 the employer did not ensure energy control procedures were utilized when employees were reassembling the filler bowl on the G-Line FMC M&S Filler Machine.  c) On or about February 2, 2023 the employer did not ensure energy control procedures were utilized when employees unjammed cans from the Tamale Packer/Unloader Machine.  d) On or about February 2, 2023 the employer did not ensure energy control procedures were utilized when employees unjammed cans from the X-Ray Machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $10937.5
  • — Z (S) $15625

1910.147 D

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Apr 12, 2023
Abate by
Apr 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.147(d):The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):  a) On or about February 2, 2023 the established procedures did not cover the actions listed in 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6) and was not done in sequence when an employee was reassembling the Graco Saniforce Drum Unloader after it had been disassembled for sanitation purposes.  b) On or about February 2, 2023 the established procedures did not cover the actions listed in 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6) and was not done in sequence when employees were reassembling the filler bowl on the G-Line FMC M&S Filler Machine.  c) On or about February 2, 2023 the established procedures did not cover the actions listed in 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6) and was not done in sequence when employees unjammed cans from the Tamale Packer/Unloader Machine.  d) On or about February 2, 2023 the established procedures did not cover the actions listed in 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6) and was not done in sequence when employees unjammed cans from the X-Ray Machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 12, 2023
Abate by
Aug 2, 2023
Penalty
Initial $14,733 · Current $10,313 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1):One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  On or about November 17, 2023, one or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from crush/struck by hazards during operation of the Cozzini Model CBFT16 hydraulic flip assist machine to flip 60 lb frozen blocks of meat out of a box and onto a stainless steel table.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $10313.1
  • — I (S) $10313.1
  • — Z (S) $14733

View Hormel Foods Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346463474.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.