EAU CLAIRE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: INLUP LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of INLUP LLC in LOT NO. 57 PLUM CREEK DRIVE, EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346551971.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- INLUP LLC
- Site address
- LOT NO. 57 PLUM CREEK DRIVE
- City
- EAU CLAIRE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54703
- Mailing
- 7808 DICKSON AVE, INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, MN 55076
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- May 26, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $413 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: (a) Citation 1, Item 1; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) with an abatement date of May 4, 2023. (b) Citation 1, Item 2a; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.307(b)(1) with an abatement date of May 4, 2023. (c) Citation 1, Item 2b; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.307(d)(1) with an abatement date of May 4, 2023. (d) Citation 1, Item 2c; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.307(e)(1)(i) with an abatement date of May 4, 2023. (e) Citation 1, Item 3; a serious violation of 29 CFR1926.503(a)(1)) with an abatement date of April 27, 2023. (f) Citation 2, Item 1; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)) with an abatement date of April 27, 2023. (g) Citation 2, Item 2; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) with an abatement date of April 27, 2023.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $413
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- May 26, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $413 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required: (a) Citation 1, Item 3; a serious violation of 29 CFR1926.503(a)(1)) with an abatement date of April 27, 2023. (b) Citation 2, Item 1; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)) with an abatement date of April 27, 2023. (c) Citation 2, Item 2; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) with an abatement date of April 27, 2023.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $413
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 13, 2023
- Abate by
- May 4, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,210 · Current $2,210
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: (a) Residential roof structure, various locations; Employees were operating pneumatic coil nail guns to install asphalt shingles without the use of eye protection to protect against flying particles.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2210
1926.307 B01
- Issued
- Apr 13, 2023
- Abate by
- May 4, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,947 · Current $2,947
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.307(b)(1): Flywheel(s) with parts seven feet or less above floor(s) or platform(s) were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1926.307(b)(1)(i) through (b)(1)(vi): (a) Residential structure, garage interior; The flywheel located on a Hitachi brand model EC 2510E, 5.5 horsepower gasoline air compressor, was not guarded, exposing ingoing nip points and rotating part(s).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2947
1926.307 D01
- Issued
- Apr 13, 2023
- Abate by
- May 4, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.307(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet (2.128 m) or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in paragraphs (m) and (o) of this section: (a) Residential structure, garage interior; The drive pulley located on a Hitachi brand model EC 2510E, 5.5 horsepower gasoline air compressor, was not guarded, exposing ingoing nip points and rotating part(s).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.307 E01 I
- Issued
- Apr 13, 2023
- Abate by
- May 4, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.307(e)(1)(i): Where both runs of a horizontal belt were 42 inches (106.68 cm) or less from the floor, the belt was not fully enclosed: (a) Residential structure, garage interior; The horizontal drive belt located on a Hitachi brand model EC 2510E, 5.5 horsepower gasoline air compressor, was not guarded, exposing ingoing nip points at the flywheel and drive pulley.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Apr 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 27, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $5,156 · Current $5,156
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) Residential roof structure, various locations; Employees exposed to fall hazards at heights ranging between approximately 10-feet, 10-inches to 24-feet, 10-inches above ground level were not trained on fall hazard recognition and mitigation methods.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5156
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 27, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $10,313 · Current $10,313
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) Residential roof structure, various locations; Employees engaged in roofing construction activities from a steep slope roof located on an under-construction single-family home were not protected from falls while working at approximate heights ranging between 10-feet, 10-inches to 24-feet, 10-inches above ground level. Inlup LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1613645, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on December 7, 2022, with respect to a workplace located at 6452 Caden Court, Eau Claire, WI, 54703.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $10313
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 27, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $7,367 · Current $7,367
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) South side of residential structure; A Werner brand 18-foot telescopic multi-position aluminum ladder placed at ground level and used as a straight ladder by employees to access the roof, was not adjusted to allow for the side rails to extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface, was not equipped with a grasping device(s), and was not effectively secured to prevent displacement. Inlup LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1613645, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on December 7, 2022, with respect to a workplace located at 6452 Caden Court, Eau Claire, WI, 54703.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $7367
More inspections at Inlup LLC
View Inlup LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346551971.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.