Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: REBER MASONRY & RESTORATION LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of REBER MASONRY & RESTORATION LLC in 215 DELL AVENUE, PITTSBURGH, PA 15216 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 347719031.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Reber Masonry & Restoration LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Reber Masonry & Restoration LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
215 DELL AVENUE
City
PITTSBURGH
State
PA
ZIP
15216
Mailing
2457 BETHEL CHURCH ROAD, BETHEL PARK, PA 15102
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,489 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights was no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer could demonstrate that a wider space was necessary:     a) Job site, 215 Dell Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about August 28, 2024, while working on scaffolding, the employer did not ensure that scaffolding levels were fully planked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2489

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,149 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means:    a) Job site, 215 Dell Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about August 28, 2024, while working on scaffolding, the employer did not ensure that appropriate steps were taken to prevent it from tipping.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $4149

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $5,807 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms and were not installed before the scaffold was released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews:    a) Job site, 215 Dell Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about August 28, 2024, while working on scaffolding, the employer did not ensure that appropriate guardrail systems were installed on the scaffolding where falls of at least approximately 18 feet or more were present.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $5807

1926.451 G04 XV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(xv): Cross bracing was used in place of a mid rail when the crossing point of two braces were between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches (0.8 m) above the work platform and no top rail was provided:     a) Job site, 215 Dell Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about August 28, 2024, while working on scaffolding, the employer did not ensure that appropriate guardrail systems were installed on the scaffolding where falls of at least approximately 18 feet or more were present in that cross bracing alone was relied upon as fall protection, and it's center point was determined to be capable of serving only as a mid rail.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F03

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $12,905 · Current $7,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:   a) Job site, 215 Dell Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about August 28, 2024, prior to allowing employees to work on scaffolding , the employer did not ensure that it was inspected by a competent person for any safety issues. Deficiencies noted, included, but were not limited to, lack of proper fall protection systems in several areas of the scaffolding, baseplates not resting on appropriate footings, scaffolding frames not pinned together,  toe boards/similar not being provided, scaffolding system not being secured in some way to prevent tipping and scaffolding levels not being fully planked.  Reber Masonry & Restoration LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1926.451 (f)(3),  which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1692715, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on October 14, 2023, with respect to a workplace located at 1600 Termon Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $7000
  • — Z (R) $12905

1926.451 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement:    a) Job site, 215 Dell Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about August 28, 2024, while working on scaffolding, the employer did not ensure that the scaffolding was resting on appropriate footings in that at least once scaffolding leg rested on unsecured and leaning retraining wall blocks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.451 H02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(h)(2): Where there was a danger of tools, materials, or equipment falling from a scaffold and striking employees below, the employer did not take steps to prevent injury:   a) Job site, 215 Dell Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about August 28, 2024, while working on scaffolding, the employer did not take appropriate steps to prevent an employee at ground level from having items on the scaffolding knocked down onto him, such as through the use of toe boards or other practices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.452 C03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(3): Frames and panels were not joined together vertically by coupling or stacking pins or equivalent means:   a) Job site, 215 Dell Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about August 28, 2024, while working on scaffolding, the employer did not ensure that the scaffolding frames were properly pinned together.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Reber Masonry & Restoration LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347719031.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.