Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: V&V SUPREMO FOODS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of V&V SUPREMO FOODS, INC. in 1934 W. 21ST STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60608 (NAICS 311513). OSHA activity number 347773996.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch V&V Supremo Foods, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for V&V Supremo Foods, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1934 W. 21ST STREET
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60608
Mailing
1934 WEST 21ST STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60608
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311513
Employees
85
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2024
Abate by
Jan 31, 2025
Penalty
Initial $16,131 · Current $8,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A):  Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation.  a.  On or about September 23, 2024, in the packaging department, the employer failed to provide effective energy control training to protect employees while performing service and/or maintenance, to include installing, setting up, inspecting and clearing jams, on the RapidPak Packaging machine, Model RP-55, Serial #955832.  Employees were thereby exposed to machine hazards associated with unexpected energization of equipment.  b.  On or about September 23, 2024, in the Crumble Room, the employer failed to provide effective energy control training to protect employees while performing service/and or maintenance, to include clearing jams, on the Ross Preformed Tray Packaging Machine, Model IN850, Serial #109.  Employees were thereby exposed to machine hazards associated with unexpected energization of equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8100
  • — Z (S) $16131

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2024
Abate by
Jan 31, 2025
Penalty
Initial $16,131 · Current $8,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d):  The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6).  a.  On or about September 23, 2024, in packaging area, employees were exposed to machine hazards associated with reenergization of equipment during service and/or maintenance, to include clearing jams, on the RapidPak Packaging Machine, Model RP-55, Serial #955832.  The employer failed to implement energy control application steps as the machine was not shut down or turned off to perform the servicing work [per the 1910.147(d)(2) requirements].  As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)((i)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect employees from machine servicing hazards.  b.  On or about September 23, 2024, in packaging area, employees were exposed to machine hazards associated with reenergization of equipment during service and/or maintenance, to include clearing jams, on the Ross Preformed Tray Packaging Machine, Model IN850, Serial #109.  The employer failed to implement energy control application steps as the machine was not shut down or turned off to perform the servicing work [per the 1910.147(d)(2) requirements].  As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)((i)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect employees from machine servicing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8100
  • — Z (S) $16131

1910.147 F03 II D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2024
Abate by
Jan 31, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D):  Each authorized employee shall affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device prior to working on the machine or equipment.    a.  On or about September 23, 2024, in the production area, the employer did not ensure that each employee affixed their own lockout or tagout device when conducting group lockout/tagout activities on the RapidPak Packaging Machine, Model RP-55, Serial #955832.  Employees were thereby exposed to the hazards of reenergization of equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View V&V Supremo Foods, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347773996.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.