Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LI GAO CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LI GAO CORPORATION in CHALAN RODEO ROAD, TAMUNING, GU 96913 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 347848111.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch LI GAO Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for LI GAO Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LI GAO CORPORATION
Site address
CHALAN RODEO ROAD
City
TAMUNING
State
GU
ZIP
96913
Mailing
P.O. BOX 27552, BARRIGADA, GU 96921
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1052 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,610 · Current $3,227 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail and one stair rail system along each unprotected side or edge:  Front side of the building interior: Employees used a stairway rising over 11 feet that was not equipped with a stair rail system on its unprotected side. Employees were exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3227
  • — Z (S) $4610

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2024
Abate by
Jan 9, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,610 · Current $3,227 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.  Second floor Balcony: Employees used a Bosch Bulldog Xtreme max chipping hammer to chip concrete without any control measures implemented from Table 1-Specified Exposure Control Methods When Working with Materials Containing Crystalline Silica. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3227
  • — Z (S) $4610

1926.1153 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2024
Abate by
Jan 9, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1153(f)(1):The employer allowed dry sweeping or dry brushing where such activity could contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica and wet sweeping, HEPA-filtered vacuuming or other methods were feasible:  Second floor Balcony: Employees dry  swept concrete chips and dust containing crystalline silica.  Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $9,219 · Current $6,453 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    Second floor balcony: An employee was chipping concrete and sweeping the debris off the edge not protected by a guard rail, safety net, or personal fall arrest system. Employees were exposed to fall hazards.  Li Gao Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1703240, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 12-12-2023, with respect to a workplace located at 223-299 Chalan Padiron Lagu, Yigo GU, 96929.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $6453.3
  • — Z (R) $9219

1926.403 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification.  Front of the building: Multiple extension cords were connected-in-series (daisy chained) providing power to temporary lighting, and a chipping hammer. Employees were exposed to fire and electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.404 B01 III C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.404(b)(1)(iii)(C): Where an assured equipment grounding conductor program was being utilized, the employer did not ensure that each cord set, attachment cap, plug and receptacle of cord sets, and any equipment connected by cord and plug, except cord sets and receptacles which are fixed and not exposed to damage, were visually inspected before each day's use for external defects, such as deformed or missing pins or insulation damage, and for indications of possible internal damage.  Front of the building: An extension cord with a missing ground pin was used to provide power to temporary lighting. Employees were exposed to fire and electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.405 G02 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  At the Electrical Box: The outer insulation of the extension cord plugged into the outlet was pulled back exposing the conductors to strain. Employees were exposed to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View LI GAO Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347848111.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.